Re: v3.9-rc1 instability on Chromebook Pixel with gmbus irq

2013-03-06 Thread Benson Leung
Hi Daniel, I've just tried drm-intel-fixes merged into v3.9-rc1, and so far it's looking good. No suspicious timeouts. Thanks for the quick response! Benson On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:35 AM, Benson Leung wrote: >> I'm working on touch devic

v3.9-rc1 instability on Chromebook Pixel with gmbus irq

2013-03-06 Thread Benson Leung
Hi Daniel, I've just tried drm-intel-fixes merged into v3.9-rc1, and so far it's looking good. No suspicious timeouts. Thanks for the quick response! Benson On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:35 AM, Benson Leung wrote: >> I'm working on touch devi

v3.9-rc1 instability on Chromebook Pixel with gmbus irq

2013-03-06 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 06 Mar 2013, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:35 AM, Benson Leung wrote: >> I'm working on touch devices Chromium OS, and I've noticed a >> regression between 3.8 and 3.9-rc1, which was posted yesterday. >> >> The hardware in question is a Chromebook Pixel. For this device,

v3.9-rc1 instability on Chromebook Pixel with gmbus irq

2013-03-06 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:35 AM, Benson Leung wrote: > I'm working on touch devices Chromium OS, and I've noticed a > regression between 3.8 and 3.9-rc1, which was posted yesterday. > > The hardware in question is a Chromebook Pixel. For this device, we > have i2c input devices: atmel mxt224s touch

Re: v3.9-rc1 instability on Chromebook Pixel with gmbus irq

2013-03-06 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 06 Mar 2013, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:35 AM, Benson Leung wrote: >> I'm working on touch devices Chromium OS, and I've noticed a >> regression between 3.8 and 3.9-rc1, which was posted yesterday. >> >> The hardware in question is a Chromebook Pixel. For this device,

Re: v3.9-rc1 instability on Chromebook Pixel with gmbus irq

2013-03-06 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:35 AM, Benson Leung wrote: > I'm working on touch devices Chromium OS, and I've noticed a > regression between 3.8 and 3.9-rc1, which was posted yesterday. > > The hardware in question is a Chromebook Pixel. For this device, we > have i2c input devices: atmel mxt224s touch

v3.9-rc1 instability on Chromebook Pixel with gmbus irq

2013-03-05 Thread Benson Leung
Hi Daniel Vetter, I'm working on touch devices Chromium OS, and I've noticed a regression between 3.8 and 3.9-rc1, which was posted yesterday. The hardware in question is a Chromebook Pixel. For this device, we have i2c input devices: atmel mxt224s touchpad and atmel mxt1664s touchscreen. The tou

v3.9-rc1 instability on Chromebook Pixel with gmbus irq

2013-03-05 Thread Benson Leung
Hi Daniel Vetter, I'm working on touch devices Chromium OS, and I've noticed a regression between 3.8 and 3.9-rc1, which was posted yesterday. The hardware in question is a Chromebook Pixel. For this device, we have i2c input devices: atmel mxt224s touchpad and atmel mxt1664s touchscreen. The tou