Op 06-01-13 20:01, Konstantin Belousov schreef:
> In ttm_write_lock(), for the interruptible sleep, the __ttm_write_lock()
> is used as the sleep predicate. On the other hand, for the
> uninterruptible case, __ttm_read_lock() is evaluated. It seems that
> the code was not changed since the initial
Op 06-01-13 20:01, Konstantin Belousov schreef:
> In ttm_write_lock(), for the interruptible sleep, the __ttm_write_lock()
> is used as the sleep predicate. On the other hand, for the
> uninterruptible case, __ttm_read_lock() is evaluated. It seems that
> the code was not changed since the initial
In ttm_write_lock(), for the interruptible sleep, the __ttm_write_lock()
is used as the sleep predicate. On the other hand, for the
uninterruptible case, __ttm_read_lock() is evaluated. It seems that
the code was not changed since the initial import at the end of 2009.
Shouldn't both cases use the
In ttm_write_lock(), for the interruptible sleep, the __ttm_write_lock()
is used as the sleep predicate. On the other hand, for the
uninterruptible case, __ttm_read_lock() is evaluated. It seems that
the code was not changed since the initial import at the end of 2009.
Shouldn't both cases use the
