On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 5:01 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>> On Wed, 27 Mar 2013, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>
>>> The GPF happens at +160, which is in the argument setup for the
>>> cmpxchg in slab_alloc_node. I think it's the call to
>>> get_freepoin
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Mar 2013, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>
>> The GPF happens at +160, which is in the argument setup for the
>> cmpxchg in slab_alloc_node. I think it's the call to
>> get_freepointer(). There was a similar bug report a while back,
>> http
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 5:01 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>> On Wed, 27 Mar 2013, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>
>>> The GPF happens at +160, which is in the argument setup for the
>>> cmpxchg in slab_alloc_node. I think it's the call to
>>> get_freepoin
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Mar 2013, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>
>> The GPF happens at +160, which is in the argument setup for the
>> cmpxchg in slab_alloc_node. I think it's the call to
>> get_freepointer(). There was a similar bug report a while back,
>> http
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 27-03-13 14:25:36, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> My system died last night apparently due to OOM conditions. Note that
>> I don't have any swap set up, but my understanding is that this is not
>> required. The full log is at: http
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 27-03-13 14:25:36, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> My system died last night apparently due to OOM conditions. Note that
>> I don't have any swap set up, but my understanding is that this is not
>> required. The full log is at: http
