https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27192
Alan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Video(Other)|Video(DRI - non Intel)
Assignee|drivers_
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 09:51:46AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Luca Tettamanti
> wrote:
> > Any printk between evergreen_mc_stop and evergreen_mc_resume locks up
> > the machine. The likely culprit is commit 023e188e:
>
> yeah, vram is locked out at that point.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 09:51:46AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Luca Tettamanti
>> wrote:
>> > Any printk between evergreen_mc_stop and evergreen_mc_resume locks up
>> > the machine. The likely culprit is
On 21.08.2012 15:51, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Luca Tettamanti
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:24:01AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
I just tested the rebased acpi_patches branch: ACPI part works fine, but
I see a big slow down during radeon driver initi
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 09:51:46AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
>> > Any printk between evergreen_mc_stop and evergreen_mc_resume locks up
>> > the machine. The likely culprit is com
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 09:51:46AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> > Any printk between evergreen_mc_stop and evergreen_mc_resume locks up
> > the machine. The likely culprit is commit 023e188e:
>
> yeah, vram is locked out at that point. I
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:24:01AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> > I just tested the rebased acpi_patches branch: ACPI part works fine, but
>> > I see a big slow down during radeon driver initialization when the
>> > screen goes black for a
On 21.08.2012 15:51, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:24:01AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
I just tested the rebased acpi_patches branch: ACPI part works fine, but
I see a big slow down during radeon driver initialization when
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:24:01AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> > I just tested the rebased acpi_patches branch: ACPI part works fine, but
>> > I see a big slow down during radeon driver initialization when the
>> > screen goes black for a
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:24:01AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > I just tested the rebased acpi_patches branch: ACPI part works fine, but
> > I see a big slow down during radeon driver initialization when the
> > screen goes black for a couple of seconds (with 3.5.0 + acpi patches the
> > screen j
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:51:10AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> I've gathered up the various outstanding radeon patches and put them
> up in a tree for testing:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux/log/?h=drm-next-3.7-wip
> Some of these may end up in -fixes, but most of them are -next
> mate
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:24:01AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > I just tested the rebased acpi_patches branch: ACPI part works fine, but
> > I see a big slow down during radeon driver initialization when the
> > screen goes black for a couple of seconds (with 3.5.0 + acpi patches the
> > screen j
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 8:30 AM, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:51:10AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> I've gathered up the various outstanding radeon patches and put them
>> up in a tree for testing:
>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux/log/?h=drm-next-3.7-wip
>> Some o
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 8:30 AM, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:51:10AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> I've gathered up the various outstanding radeon patches and put them
>> up in a tree for testing:
>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux/log/?h=drm-next-3.7-wip
>> Some o
I've gathered up the various outstanding radeon patches and put them
up in a tree for testing:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux/log/?h=drm-next-3.7-wip
Some of these may end up in -fixes, but most of them are -next
material. I haven't had a chance to go through Christian's last set
of VM p
I've gathered up the various outstanding radeon patches and put them
up in a tree for testing:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux/log/?h=drm-next-3.7-wip
Some of these may end up in -fixes, but most of them are -next
material. I haven't had a chance to go through Christian's last set
of VM p
> Oh I wasn't aware anyone still used it, I just pushed a branch for
> Jerome the other day to test something, its known broken.
Oh, boy... sorry for the noise, then. This was caused by
the way I am using git: I cloned the Linus Torvalds tree,
and then used 'git add' to include several tree
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 6:02 PM, David Witbrodt
wrote:
> Maybe I'm doing something wrong, but my cloned repo of
> drm-radeon-testing is giving build errors. What I'm
> seeing is
Oh I wasn't aware anyone still used it, I just pushed a branch for
Jerome the other day to t
> Oh I wasn't aware anyone still used it, I just pushed a branch for
> Jerome the other day to test something, its known broken.
Oh, boy... sorry for the noise, then. This was caused by
the way I am using git: I cloned the Linus Torvalds tree,
and then used 'git add' to include several tree
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 6:02 PM, David Witbrodt wrote:
> Maybe I'm doing something wrong, but my cloned repo of
> drm-radeon-testing is giving build errors. What I'm
> seeing is
Oh I wasn't aware anyone still used it, I just pushed a branch for
Jerome the other day to t
Maybe I'm doing something wrong, but my cloned repo of
drm-radeon-testing is giving build errors. What I'm
seeing is
[...]
CC drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gem.o
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gem.c: In function ‘radeon_gem_create_ioctl’:
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ra
Maybe I'm doing something wrong, but my cloned repo of
drm-radeon-testing is giving build errors. What I'm
seeing is
[...]
CC drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gem.o
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gem.c: In function ?radeon_gem_create_ioctl?:
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ra
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34567
--- Comment #11 from Andy Furniss 2011-02-28
08:17:35 PST ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> can you test with latest -ati master?
>
> I've got a 1080p video playing here now.
Fixed for me on rv790.
Can't see any jerkyness that isn't also present
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34567
--- Comment #11 from Andy Furniss 2011-02-28
08:17:35 PST ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> can you test with latest -ati master?
>
> I've got a 1080p video playing here now.
Fixed for me on rv790.
Can't see any jerkyness that isn't also present
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34567
Jan Buecken changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34567
Jan Buecken changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34567
--- Comment #9 from Michael Lothian 2011-02-28 01:55:33
PST ---
I quickly tested it before leaving the house this morning. Seems to be working,
though it did look jerky
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34567
--- Comment #9 from Michael Lothian 2011-02-28
01:55:33 PST ---
I quickly tested it before leaving the house this morning. Seems to be working,
though it did look jerky
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34567
--- Comment #8 from Dave Airlie 2011-02-27 20:08:27
PST ---
can you test with latest -ati master?
I've got a 1080p video playing here now.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving th
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34567
--- Comment #8 from Dave Airlie 2011-02-27
20:08:27 PST ---
can you test with latest -ati master?
I've got a 1080p video playing here now.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving th
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34567
--- Comment #7 from Andy Furniss 2011-02-23
02:28:40 PST ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Does this commit to the ddx fix the issue?
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-ati/commit/?id=91070cfd75d5607c4a72ace780f830f0ddb40e84
No.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34567
--- Comment #7 from Andy Furniss 2011-02-23
02:28:40 PST ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Does this commit to the ddx fix the issue?
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-ati/commit/?id=91070cfd75d5607c4a72ace780f830f0ddb40e84
No.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34567
--- Comment #6 from Alex Deucher 2011-02-22 22:05:12 PST ---
Does this commit to the ddx fix the issue?
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-ati/commit/?id=91070cfd75d5607c4a72ace780f830f0ddb40e84
--
Configure bugmail: https://bug
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34567
--- Comment #6 from Alex Deucher 2011-02-22 22:05:12 PST
---
Does this commit to the ddx fix the issue?
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-ati/commit/?id=91070cfd75d5607c4a72ace780f830f0ddb40e84
--
Configure bugmail: https://bu
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34567
--- Comment #5 from Alex Deucher 2011-02-22 18:51:02 PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
>
> I don't test this yet, but is it necessary? Because it is maybe more important
> that I just reverted
> (http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/airlied
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34567
--- Comment #5 from Alex Deucher 2011-02-22 18:51:02 PST
---
(In reply to comment #4)
>
> I don't test this yet, but is it necessary? Because it is maybe more important
> that I just reverted
> (http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/airlie
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34567
--- Comment #4 from Jan Buecken 2011-02-22 18:33:48 PST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Is this still an issue with the latest commits in xf86-video-ati?
Yes. Sorry, my git bisect log is misunderstanding: Ofcourse I tested
xf86-video-ati from to
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34567
--- Comment #4 from Jan Buecken 2011-02-22 18:33:48 PST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Is this still an issue with the latest commits in xf86-video-ati?
Yes. Sorry, my git bisect log is misunderstanding: Ofcourse I tested
xf86-video-ati from to
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34567
--- Comment #3 from Alex Deucher 2011-02-22 08:25:33 PST ---
Is this still an issue with the latest commits in xf86-video-ati? This is
probably be related to the CS block size checking changes in d-r-t
(http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34567
--- Comment #3 from Alex Deucher 2011-02-22 08:25:33 PST
---
Is this still an issue with the latest commits in xf86-video-ati? This is
probably be related to the CS block size checking changes in d-r-t
(http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34567
--- Comment #2 from Andy Furniss 2011-02-22
07:35:34 PST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> The commit 7ac3a2e0bcdadff7c7172a9f833f526b526da16b belongs to the
> xf86-video-ati git. (To make clear it does not belong to the
> drm-radeo
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34567
--- Comment #2 from Andy Furniss 2011-02-22
07:35:34 PST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> The commit 7ac3a2e0bcdadff7c7172a9f833f526b526da16b belongs to the
> xf86-video-ati git. (To make clear it does not belong to the
> drm-radeo
|drm-radeon-testing git: CS |drm-radeon-testing git: CS
|checker leads mplayer / vlc |checker let mplayer / vlc
|to fail with xv |to fail with xv
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving
|drm-radeon-testing git: CS |drm-radeon-testing git: CS
|checker leads mplayer / vlc |checker let mplayer / vlc
|to fail with xv |to fail with xv
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34567
--- Comment #1 from Jan Buecken 2011-02-22 05:53:57 PST ---
The commit 7ac3a2e0bcdadff7c7172a9f833f526b526da16b belongs to the
xf86-video-ati git. (To make clear it does not belong to the drm-radeon-testing
git branch).
--
Configure bugmail
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34567
--- Comment #1 from Jan Buecken 2011-02-22 05:53:57 PST ---
The commit 7ac3a2e0bcdadff7c7172a9f833f526b526da16b belongs to the
xf86-video-ati git. (To make clear it does not belong to the drm-radeon-testing
git branch).
--
Configure bugmail
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34567
Summary: xf86-video-ati git and drm-radeon-testing git: CS
checker leads mplayer / vlc to fail with xv
Product: Mesa
Version: git
Platform: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS/Version: Linux
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34567
Summary: xf86-video-ati git and drm-radeon-testing git: CS
checker leads mplayer / vlc to fail with xv
Product: Mesa
Version: git
Platform: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS/Version: Linux
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28342
Fabio Pedretti changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28342
Fabio Pedretti changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26635
Tobias Jakobi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26635
Tobias Jakobi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30025
Andy Furniss changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30025
Andy Furniss changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30025
--- Comment #2 from aaron 2010-09-05 05:05:55 PDT ---
yep passing radeon.no_wb=1 to the kernel fixes it
@glxgears i kinda expected that but i don't think im using it for one...
im just trying to show the difference between reported and apparent
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30025
--- Comment #2 from aaron 2010-09-05 05:05:55 PDT
---
yep passing radeon.no_wb=1 to the kernel fixes it
@glxgears i kinda expected that but i don't think im using it for one...
im just trying to show the difference between reported and apparent
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30025
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Jakobi 2010-09-05 04:06:47 PDT
---
I think this one is well knows, have you tried disabling writeback with no_wb=1
as radeon module parameter?
Also note that gears is _not_ a benchmark.
--
Configure bugmail: https:/
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30025
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Jakobi 2010-09-05 04:06:47
PDT ---
I think this one is well knows, have you tried disabling writeback with no_wb=1
as radeon module parameter?
Also note that gears is _not_ a benchmark.
--
Configure bugmail: https:/
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30025
Summary: r600 kms, massave slowdown with latest
drm-radeon-testing
Product: DRI
Version: XOrg CVS
Platform: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS/Version: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30025
Summary: r600 kms, massave slowdown with latest
drm-radeon-testing
Product: DRI
Version: XOrg CVS
Platform: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS/Version: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Marius Gr?ger
wrote:
> Am 07.06.2010 00:15, wrote Dave Airlie:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:52 AM, Marius Gr?ger
>> ?wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 06.06.2010 18:47, schrieb James Simmons:
>> Apologies for such an unspecific description, and for what almost
>> se
Am 07.06.2010 00:15, wrote Dave Airlie:
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:52 AM, Marius Gr?ger
> wrote:
>> Am 06.06.2010 18:47, schrieb James Simmons:
>>>
> Apologies for such an unspecific description, and for what almost seems
> like a support request for MythTV. I wouldn't post here if I were
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28341
Mario Kleiner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28341
Mario Kleiner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Marius Gröger
wrote:
> Am 07.06.2010 00:15, wrote Dave Airlie:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:52 AM, Marius Gröger
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 06.06.2010 18:47, schrieb James Simmons:
>> Apologies for such an unspecific description, and for what almost
>> se
Am 07.06.2010 00:15, wrote Dave Airlie:
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:52 AM, Marius Gröger
wrote:
Am 06.06.2010 18:47, schrieb James Simmons:
Apologies for such an unspecific description, and for what almost seems
like a support request for MythTV. I wouldn't post here if I were not
100% sure it
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28341
Mario Kleiner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #37401|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28341
Mario Kleiner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #37401|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28341
--- Comment #28 from Andy Furniss 2010-07-27
11:30:10 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #27)
> Created an attachment (id=37414)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=37414
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=28341&attachm
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28341
--- Comment #28 from Andy Furniss 2010-07-27
11:30:10 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #27)
> Created an attachment (id=37414)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=37414
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=28341&attachm
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28341
--- Comment #27 from Mario Kleiner 2010-07-27
10:50:26 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=37414)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=37414
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=28341&attachment=37414
Fix frontbuffer
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28341
--- Comment #27 from Mario Kleiner
2010-07-27 10:50:26 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=37414)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=37414
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=28341&attachment=37414
Fix frontbuffer
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28341
--- Comment #26 from Andy Furniss 2010-07-27
06:47:43 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> (In reply to comment #22)
> > Created an attachment (id=37401)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=37401
Review: https://bugs.freedeskto
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28341
--- Comment #26 from Andy Furniss 2010-07-27
06:47:43 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> (In reply to comment #22)
> > Created an attachment (id=37401)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=37401
Review: https://bugs.freedeskto
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28341
--- Comment #25 from Andy Furniss 2010-07-27
03:26:58 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> Created an attachment (id=37401)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=37401
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=28341&attachm
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28341
--- Comment #25 from Andy Furniss 2010-07-27
03:26:58 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> Created an attachment (id=37401)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=37401
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=28341&attachm
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28341
--- Comment #24 from Mario Kleiner 2010-07-26
17:31:53 PDT ---
Jerome,
your Improved patch works on R600 for me as well, thanks for improving it and
teaching me about the proper draw functions for non-r600 gpu's :-). It took me
half a day to in
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28341
--- Comment #24 from Mario Kleiner
2010-07-26 17:31:53 PDT ---
Jerome,
your Improved patch works on R600 for me as well, thanks for improving it and
teaching me about the proper draw functions for non-r600 gpu's :-). It took me
half a day to in
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28341
--- Comment #23 from Andrew Randrianasulu 2010-07-26 14:30:28
PDT ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> Created an attachment (id=37401)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=37401
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=28341
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28341
--- Comment #23 from Andrew Randrianasulu 2010-07-26
14:30:28 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> Created an attachment (id=37401)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=37401
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=28341
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28341
Jerome Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #37366|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28341
Jerome Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #37366|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28341
--- Comment #21 from Shlomi Steinberg 2010-07-25
13:07:54 PDT ---
Confirmed. Both patches fix etracer for me. r600, HD 3850.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28341
--- Comment #21 from Shlomi Steinberg 2010-07-25
13:07:54 PDT ---
Confirmed. Both patches fix etracer for me. r600, HD 3850.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28341
--- Comment #20 from Mario Kleiner 2010-07-25
08:26:41 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=37368)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=37368
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=28341&attachment=37368
Proof of concept
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28341
--- Comment #20 from Mario Kleiner
2010-07-25 08:26:41 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=37368)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=37368
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=28341&attachment=37368
Proof of concept
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28341
Mario Kleiner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #37317|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28341
Mario Kleiner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #37317|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28341
--- Comment #18 from Mario Kleiner 2010-07-22
13:23:07 PDT ---
Jerome,
as far as i can see, your flush, invalidate patch is in the right direction,
but the dri2InvalidateDrawable() call just increments drawable->dri2.stamp and
the current radeo
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28341
--- Comment #18 from Mario Kleiner
2010-07-22 13:23:07 PDT ---
Jerome,
as far as i can see, your flush, invalidate patch is in the right direction,
but the dri2InvalidateDrawable() call just increments drawable->dri2.stamp and
the current radeo
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28341
--- Comment #17 from Shlomi Steinberg 2010-07-22
11:09:51 PDT ---
Patched today's mesa git. Still need vblank_mode=0.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: -
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28341
--- Comment #17 from Shlomi Steinberg 2010-07-22
11:09:51 PDT ---
Patched today's mesa git. Still need vblank_mode=0.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: -
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28341
--- Comment #16 from Jerome Glisse 2010-07-22 10:00:00
PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=37317)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=37317
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=28341&attachment=37317
Add flush,invali
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28341
--- Comment #16 from Jerome Glisse 2010-07-22
10:00:00 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=37317)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=37317
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=28341&attachment=37317
Add flush,invali
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28341
Shlomi Steinberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ssteinb...@gmail.com
--- Comment #15
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28341
Shlomi Steinberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ssteinberg at gmail.com
--- Comment #
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28341
--- Comment #14 from Andy Furniss 2010-07-16
06:02:09 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> (In reply to comment #12)
> > Created an attachment (id=37035)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=37035
Review: https://bugs.freedeskto
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28341
--- Comment #14 from Andy Furniss 2010-07-16
06:02:09 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> (In reply to comment #12)
> > Created an attachment (id=37035)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=37035
Review: https://bugs.freedeskto
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28341
--- Comment #13 from Andy Furniss 2010-07-14
05:04:35 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Created an attachment (id=37035)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=37035
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=28341&attachm
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28341
--- Comment #13 from Andy Furniss 2010-07-14
05:04:35 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Created an attachment (id=37035)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=37035
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=28341&attachm
1 - 100 of 226 matches
Mail list logo