[Nouveau] nouveau/ttm: BUG in ttm_bo_release_list

2010-10-09 Thread Marcin Slusarz
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 03:53:58PM +0200, Kai Ruhnau wrote: > On 09/18/2010 01:18 PM, Marcin Slusarz wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 09:39:21AM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote: > >> On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 19:43 +0200, Marcin Slusarz wrote: > >>> Hi > >>> Since upgrade from 2.6.35 to 2.6.36-rc3 (nouveau

[Nouveau] nouveau/ttm: BUG in ttm_bo_release_list

2010-10-09 Thread Kai Ruhnau
On 09/18/2010 01:18 PM, Marcin Slusarz wrote: > On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 09:39:21AM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote: >> On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 19:43 +0200, Marcin Slusarz wrote: >>> Hi >>> Since upgrade from 2.6.35 to 2.6.36-rc3 (nouveau tree) I'm hitting this bug >>> a couple of times a day: [oops] >>> th

Re: [Nouveau] nouveau/ttm: BUG in ttm_bo_release_list

2010-10-09 Thread Kai Ruhnau
On 09/18/2010 01:18 PM, Marcin Slusarz wrote: > On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 09:39:21AM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote: >> On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 19:43 +0200, Marcin Slusarz wrote: >>> Hi >>> Since upgrade from 2.6.35 to 2.6.36-rc3 (nouveau tree) I'm hitting this bug >>> a couple of times a day: [oops] >>> th

Re: [Nouveau] nouveau/ttm: BUG in ttm_bo_release_list

2010-10-09 Thread Marcin Slusarz
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 03:53:58PM +0200, Kai Ruhnau wrote: > On 09/18/2010 01:18 PM, Marcin Slusarz wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 09:39:21AM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote: > >> On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 19:43 +0200, Marcin Slusarz wrote: > >>> Hi > >>> Since upgrade from 2.6.35 to 2.6.36-rc3 (nouveau

nouveau/ttm: BUG in ttm_bo_release_list

2010-09-18 Thread Marcin Slusarz
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 09:39:21AM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote: > On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 19:43 +0200, Marcin Slusarz wrote: > > Hi > > Since upgrade from 2.6.35 to 2.6.36-rc3 (nouveau tree) I'm hitting this bug > > a couple of times a day: > > > > [ 2869.618504] [ cut here ] >

nouveau/ttm: BUG in ttm_bo_release_list

2010-09-18 Thread Ben Skeggs
On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 19:43 +0200, Marcin Slusarz wrote: > Hi > Since upgrade from 2.6.35 to 2.6.36-rc3 (nouveau tree) I'm hitting this bug a > couple of times a day: > > [ 2869.618504] [ cut here ] > [ 2869.618532] kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c:153! > [ 2869.

Re: nouveau/ttm: BUG in ttm_bo_release_list

2010-09-18 Thread Marcin Slusarz
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 09:39:21AM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote: > On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 19:43 +0200, Marcin Slusarz wrote: > > Hi > > Since upgrade from 2.6.35 to 2.6.36-rc3 (nouveau tree) I'm hitting this bug > > a couple of times a day: > > > > [ 2869.618504] [ cut here ] >

nouveau/ttm: BUG in ttm_bo_release_list

2010-09-17 Thread Marcin Slusarz
Hi Since upgrade from 2.6.35 to 2.6.36-rc3 (nouveau tree) I'm hitting this bug a couple of times a day: [ 2869.618504] [ cut here ] [ 2869.618532] kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c:153! [ 2869.618560] invalid opcode: [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 2869.618600] last sysf

Re: nouveau/ttm: BUG in ttm_bo_release_list

2010-09-17 Thread Ben Skeggs
On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 19:43 +0200, Marcin Slusarz wrote: > Hi > Since upgrade from 2.6.35 to 2.6.36-rc3 (nouveau tree) I'm hitting this bug a > couple of times a day: > > [ 2869.618504] [ cut here ] > [ 2869.618532] kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c:153! > [ 2869.

nouveau/ttm: BUG in ttm_bo_release_list

2010-09-17 Thread Marcin Slusarz
Hi Since upgrade from 2.6.35 to 2.6.36-rc3 (nouveau tree) I'm hitting this bug a couple of times a day: [ 2869.618504] [ cut here ] [ 2869.618532] kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c:153! [ 2869.618560] invalid opcode: [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 2869.618600] last sysf