Hi all,
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 13:30:13 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:3118:
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_bo.c: In function 'ccs_test_migrate':
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:3118:
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_bo.c: In function 'ccs_test_migrate':
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_bo.c:63:15: error: too many argum
Hi all,
After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:3118:
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_bo.c: In function 'ccs_test_migrate':
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_bo.c:63:15: error: too many arguments to functi
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 12:28 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2024 10:19:01 -0700 Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 07:13:19PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > > allyesconfi
Hi all,
On Mon, 1 Jul 2024 10:19:01 -0700 Nathan Chancellor wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 07:13:19PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > allyesconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > In file included from arch/powerpc/include/a
On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 07:13:19PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu.h:144,
> from arch/powerpc/include/asm/paca.h:18,
Hi all,
After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu.h:144,
from arch/powerpc/include/asm/paca.h:18,
from arch/powerpc/include/asm/current.h:13,
f
Thorsten Leemhuis writes:
> Lo!
>
> Sometimes the regression tracker runs into regressions himself... :-D
>
> On 11.04.23 08:47, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>
>> After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c:73:
Lo!
Sometimes the regression tracker runs into regressions himself... :-D
On 11.04.23 08:47, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c:73:29: error: variably modified
> 'global_
Hi all,
After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c:73:29: error: variably modified
'global_write_combined' at file scope
73 | static struct ttm_pool_type global_write_combined[TTM_DIM_ORDER];
|
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 01:12:22PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c:33:
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c: In function 'drm_fb_helpe
Hi all,
After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c:33:
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c: In function 'drm_fb_helper_single_fb_probe':
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c:1968:24: error: 'dev' undecl
Hi Alex,
On Thu, 6 Oct 2022 09:56:32 -0400 Alex Deucher wrote:
>
> This looks good to me. Care to add you s-o-b?
>
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 4:12 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > This works as well, and (in my opinion) is better:
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_str
On 2022-10-06 04:12, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
On Thu, 6 Oct 2022 09:28:10 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
I have applied the following hack for today:
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 09:14:26 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] fix up for drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_stream.
This looks good to me. Care to add you s-o-b?
Alex
On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 4:12 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 6 Oct 2022 09:28:10 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > I have applied the following hack for today:
> >
> > From: Stephen Rothwell
> > Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022
Hi all,
On Thu, 6 Oct 2022 09:28:10 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> I have applied the following hack for today:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell
> Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 09:14:26 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] fix up for drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_stream.c
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwel
Hi all,
On Wed, 5 Oct 2022 12:45:31 -0400 Hamza Mahfooz wrote:
>
> On 2022-10-05 11:30, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > @Mahfooz, Hamza
> > @Aurabindo Pillai can you get this fixed up?
> >
>
> Seems like this is a false positive for GCC versions pre-12, because I'm not
> seeing this warning on GCC 1
On 2022-10-05 11:30, Alex Deucher wrote:
@Mahfooz, Hamza
@Aurabindo Pillai can you get this fixed up?
Seems like this is a false positive for GCC versions pre-12, because I'm
not seeing this warning on GCC 12.2.
However, we can fix this for older GCC versions with the following:
diff --git
@Mahfooz, Hamza
@Aurabindo Pillai can you get this fixed up?
Thanks,
Alex
On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 7:39 AM Mark Brown wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 02:05:58PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > On Tue, 4 Oct 2022 12:24:37 +1000 David Airlie wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 12:21 PM Steph
On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 02:05:58PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Oct 2022 12:24:37 +1000 David Airlie wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 12:21 PM Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> > I'm not seeing it here, what gcc is this with?
> I am using an x86_64 cross compiler hosted on ppc64le -
Hi Dave,
On Tue, 4 Oct 2022 12:24:37 +1000 David Airlie wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 12:21 PM Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 30 Sep 2022 11:54:34 +0100 broo...@kernel.org wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > > allmodconfig) failed
On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 12:21 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi broo...@kernel.org,
>
> On Fri, 30 Sep 2022 11:54:34 +0100 broo...@kernel.org wrote:
> >
> > After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > /tmp/next/build/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/a
Hi broo...@kernel.org,
On Fri, 30 Sep 2022 11:54:34 +0100 broo...@kernel.org wrote:
>
> After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> /tmp/next/build/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc_stream.c: In
> function 'dc_stream_remove_wr
Yes, please do., sorry for HTML, stuck on tablet.
On Tue, 1 Mar 2022, 1:33 am Robert Foss, wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Caused by commit
> > > >
> > > > b5c84a9edcd418 ("drm/bridge: add it6505 driver")
> > > >
> > > > I have used the drm tree from yesterday instead.
> > >
> > > hi all,
> > >
> > > T
> > >
> > > Caused by commit
> > >
> > > b5c84a9edcd418 ("drm/bridge: add it6505 driver")
> > >
> > > I have used the drm tree from yesterday instead.
> >
> > hi all,
> >
> > The following fix should be able to address the errors. Should it be
> > squashed into b5c84a9edcd418 ("drm/bridge: add it
On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 at 16:44, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2022 at 12:43 AM wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86 allmodconfig)
> > failed like this:
> >
> > lib/strncpy_from_user.o: warning: objtool: strncpy_from_user()+0x10b: call
>
On Sat, Feb 26, 2022 at 12:43 AM wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> lib/strncpy_from_user.o: warning: objtool: strncpy_from_user()+0x10b: call to
> do_strncpy_from_user() with UACCESS enabled
> lib/strnlen_user.o:
Hi all,
On Fri, 25 Feb 2022 16:42:31 + broo...@kernel.org wrote:
>
> After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> /tmp/next/build/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c: In function
> 'receive_timing_debugfs_show':
> /tmp/next/build/drivers/gpu
Hi all,
After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
lib/strncpy_from_user.o: warning: objtool: strncpy_from_user()+0x10b: call to
do_strncpy_from_user() with UACCESS enabled
lib/strnlen_user.o: warning: objtool: strnlen_user()+0xbb: call to
do_strnl
On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 5:14 AM Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 4:34 PM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 12:49 AM Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2 Sep 2021 07:50:38 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 2
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 4:34 PM Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 12:49 AM Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On Thu, 2 Sep 2021 07:50:38 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 20 Aug 2021 15:23:34 +0900 Masahiro Yamada
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On F
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 12:49 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 2 Sep 2021 07:50:38 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 20 Aug 2021 15:23:34 +0900 Masahiro Yamada
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 11:33 AM Stephen Rothwell
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > Af
Hi all,
On Thu, 2 Sep 2021 07:50:38 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 20 Aug 2021 15:23:34 +0900 Masahiro Yamada
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 11:33 AM Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> > >
> > After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > >
Hi Masahiro,
On Fri, 20 Aug 2021 15:23:34 +0900 Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 11:33 AM Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > failed like this:
> >
> > In file included from drivers/gp
On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 11:33 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c:39:
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h:9:10: fatal error:
Hi all,
After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c:39:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h:9:10: fatal error: stddef.h: No
such file or directory
9 | #include
|
Hi all,
After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c:43:13: error:
redefinition of 'intel_dp_reset_lttpr_common_caps'
43 | static void intel_dp_reset_lttpr_common_caps(struct intel_dp *intel_
Hi Daniel,
On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 13:12:21 +0100 Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> I've pulled drm-misc-next into drm-next now, so as long as all other
> drm trees are merged after drm, this should be solved now.
> drm-intel-next also has their msm build breakage fixed (I acked the
> patch already), so hopef
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 2:06 AM Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> On Mon, 18 Jan 2021 at 10:59, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:56:54 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 12:25:40 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fr
On Mon, 18 Jan 2021 at 10:59, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:56:54 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 12:25:40 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 11:55:18 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
Hi all,
On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:56:54 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 12:25:40 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 11:55:18 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
>
Hi all,
On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 12:25:40 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 11:55:18 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > failed like this:
> >
> > error: the following would cause module name confl
Hi all,
On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 11:55:18 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> error: the following would cause module name conflict:
> drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-dsi-cm
Hi all,
After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
error: the following would cause module name conflict:
drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-dsi-cm.ko
drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-dsi-cm.ko
Maybe caused by commit
cf64148abcfd (
Hi all,
After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c: In function 'get_mocs_settings':
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c:363:22: error: 'GEN11_NUM_MOCS_ENTRIES'
undeclared (first use in this function); did yo
Le mer. 30 sept. 2020 à 18:11, Christoph Hellwig a écrit
:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 03:33:13PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote:
One thing missing for remap_pfn_range(), I have no alternative for
this:
vma->vm_page_prot = dma_pgprot(dev, vma->vm_page_prot,
DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT);
So I hav
Le mer. 30 sept. 2020 à 18:40, Christoph Hellwig a écrit
:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 06:39:18PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote:
dma_alloc_pages gives you cached memory, so you can't just use an
uncached protection for the userspace mmap here. If you want
uncached
memory you need to use dma_a
Hi Christoph,
Le mer. 30 sept. 2020 à 11:02, Christoph Hellwig a écrit
:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 03:31:28PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote:
It's allocated with dma_alloc_wc, but then it's only accessed as
non-coherent.
Anyway, for the time being I guess you could revert 37054fc81443.
But I
Hi Christoph,
Le lun. 28 sept. 2020 à 8:04, Christoph Hellwig a écrit :
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 01:54:05PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig)
failed like this:
The driver needs to switch do dma_alloc_noncohe
Le lun. 28 sept. 2020 à 14:10, Christoph Hellwig a écrit
:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 01:46:55PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote:
dma_mmap_attrs can only be used on allocations from dma_mmap_attrs
with
the same attrs. As there is no allocation using
DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT
in the drm core, so
Le lun. 28 sept. 2020 à 13:34, Christoph Hellwig a écrit
:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 12:15:56PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote:
Hi Christoph,
Le lun. 28 sept. 2020 à 8:04, Christoph Hellwig a
écrit :
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 01:54:05PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merg
On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 at 16:05, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 01:54:05PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > failed like this:
>
> The driver needs to switch do dma_alloc_noncoherent
Hi all,
After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm-drv.c: In function 'ingenic_drm_sync_data':
drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm-drv.c:478:4: error: implicit declaration of
function 'dma_cache_sync'; did you
Hi all,
After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
In file included from include/asm-generic/bug.h:19,
from arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h:83,
from include/linux/bug.h:5,
from include/linux/seq_file.h
Hi all,
After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
arch/powerpc/platforms/embedded6xx/Kconfig:2:error: recursive dependency
detected!
arch/powerpc/platforms/embedded6xx/Kconfig:2: symbol EMBEDDED6xx depends on
BROKEN_ON_SMP
init/Kconfig:79
Hi all,
After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h:35,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h:17,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.h:9,
Hi all,
After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c: In function 'dma_buf_fs_mount':
drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c:65:9: error: implicit declaration of function
'mount_pseudo'; did you mean 'mount_bdev'?
[-Werror=implicit
Hi all,
After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_prime.c:43:18: error: redefinition of
'virtgpu_gem_prime_get_sg_table'
struct sg_table *virtgpu_gem_prime_get_sg_table(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
I've applied this locally for now so I can continue arm64 builds :-)
Dave.
On 16 May 2018 at 18:09, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 9:53 AM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>> allyesconfig) failed like this:
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 9:53 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c: In function
> 'init_user_pages':
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_
Hi all,
After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c: In function 'init_user_pages':
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c:632:3: error: implicit
declaration of function 'release_pages';
Hi all,
After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../powerplay/hwmgr/smu7_hwmgr.c: In function
'smu7_notify_link_speed_change_after_state_change':
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../powerplay/hwmgr/smu7_hwmgr.c:3830:7: err
Hi all,
After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c:219:6:
error: redefinition of 'dm_dp_mst_dc_sink_create'
void dm_dp_mst_dc_sink_create(struct drm_connector *connector)
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 1:51 AM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>> This cherry picking of fixes from new development back to Linus' tree
>> can be a real pain when so many other changes happen in the same files.
>
> One possible fix for this wou
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 1:51 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> This cherry picking of fixes from new development back to Linus' tree
> can be a real pain when so many other changes happen in the same files.
One possible fix for this would be if you reuse our rerere cache. The
only reason we don't go
Hi Dave,
After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c: In function 'gen6_rps_reset_ei':
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:1115:38: error: 'struct intel_gen6_power_mgmt'
has no member named 'down_ei'
vlv_c0_read(dev_p
Hi Dave,
After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c:34:0:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c: In function
'intel_opregion_get_panel_type':
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c:1042:1
On 7/15/16, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c:34:0:
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c: In function
> 'intel_opregion_get_panel_t
Hi Dave,
After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c: In function 'intel_prepare_ddi_buffer':
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c:447:15: error: 'struct drm_i915_private' has
no member named 'edp_low_vswing'
if (de
On Thu, 28 Apr 2016, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c: In function 'intel_prepare_ddi_buffer':
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c:447:15: error: 'struct drm_i91
70 matches
Mail list logo
