[Intel-gfx] Fwd: linux-next: Tree for Jul 1 [ drm-intel-next: Several call-traces ]

2013-09-29 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 05:48:06PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 06:34:38PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:56:52AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:17:52PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at

Re: Fwd: linux-next: Tree for Jul 1 [ drm-intel-next: Several call-traces ]

2013-09-26 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:56:52AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:17:52PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin > > wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 04:05:11PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > >> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 a

Fwd: linux-next: Tree for Jul 1 [ drm-intel-next: Several call-traces ]

2013-09-25 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:56:52AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:17:52PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin > > wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 04:05:11PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > >> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 a

[Intel-gfx] Fwd: linux-next: Tree for Jul 1 [ drm-intel-next: Several call-traces ]

2013-09-25 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 06:34:38PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:56:52AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:17:52PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin > > > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 201

Re: Fwd: linux-next: Tree for Jul 1 [ drm-intel-next: Several call-traces ]

2013-09-25 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:17:52PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 04:05:11PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:22:58AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > >> > [ Re: [Intel-gfx] i915 produci

Re: Fwd: linux-next: Tree for Jul 1 [ drm-intel-next: Several call-traces ]

2013-09-24 Thread Dave Airlie
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 04:05:11PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:22:58AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> > [ Re: [Intel-gfx] i915 producing warnings with kernel 3.11-rc5 ] >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > saw your p

Re: Fwd: linux-next: Tree for Jul 1 [ drm-intel-next: Several call-traces ]

2013-09-23 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
7. I still see this with 3.11. Following this message, my VGA monitor goes blank and shows an error suggesting a wrong resolution or frequency are set. Anyone? > > > > > -- Forwarded message ------ > > From: Sedat Dilek > > Date: Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 7:3

Re: Fwd: linux-next: Tree for Jul 1 [ drm-intel-next: Several call-traces ]

2013-08-26 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
nightly? > > Regards, > - Sedat - > > [1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2013-August/032154.html Same thing observed with v3.11-rc7. > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Sedat Dilek > Date: Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 7:31 AM > Subject: Re: linux-

Fwd: linux-next: Tree for Jul 1 [ drm-intel-next: Several call-traces ]

2013-08-26 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
nightly? > > Regards, > - Sedat - > > [1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2013-August/032154.html Same thing observed with v3.11-rc7. > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Sedat Dilek > Date: Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 7:31 AM > Subject: Re: linux-

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 1 [ drm-intel-next: Several call-traces ]

2013-07-03 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Stephen Rothwell >>> wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20130628: The regula

linux-next: Tree for Jul 1 [ drm-intel-next: Several call-traces ]

2013-07-02 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Daniel Vetter > wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Sedat Dilek >> wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Stephen Rothwell >>> wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20130628: The

linux-next: Tree for Jul 1 [ drm-intel-next: Several call-traces ]

2013-07-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Changes since 20130628: >>> >>> The regulator tree gained a build failure so I used the version from >>>

linux-next: Tree for Jul 1 [ drm-intel-next: Several call-traces ]

2013-07-01 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20130628: >> >> The regulator tree gained a build failure so I used the version from >> next-20130628. >> >> The trivial tree gained a conflict against t

linux-next: Tree for Jul 1 [ drm-intel-next: Several call-traces ]

2013-07-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20130628: > > The regulator tree gained a build failure so I used the version from > next-20130628. > > The trivial tree gained a conflict against the fbdev tree. > > The arm-soc tree gained a conflict against the

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 1 [ drm-intel-next: Several call-traces ]

2013-07-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Changes since 20130628: >>> >>> The regulator tree gained a build failure so I used the version from >>>

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 1 [ drm-intel-next: Several call-traces ]

2013-07-01 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20130628: >> >> The regulator tree gained a build failure so I used the version from >> next-20130628. >> >> The trivial tree gained a conflict against t