Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-intel tree

On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 11:48:00AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 10:16:41AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Aug 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 09:19:39AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote: > > >> On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 04:05:59PM +0200, Daniel Vett

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-intel tree

On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 10:16:41AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 10 Aug 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 09:19:39AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 04:05:59PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> > On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 09:36:56AM +0300, Joonas Lahti

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-intel tree

On Wed, 11 Aug 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 10:16:41AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Tue, 10 Aug 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> > On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 09:19:39AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote: >> >> On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 04:05:59PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> >> > On Fr

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-intel tree

On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 10:16:41AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 10 Aug 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 09:19:39AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 04:05:59PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> > On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 09:36:56AM +0300, Joonas Lahti

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-intel tree

On Tue, 10 Aug 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 09:19:39AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 04:05:59PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> > On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 09:36:56AM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: >> > > Hi Matt, >> > > >> > > Always use the dim tooling

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-intel tree

+ Dave as FYI Quoting Daniel Vetter (2021-08-10 09:27:25) > On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 09:19:39AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 04:05:59PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 09:36:56AM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > > > > Hi Matt, > > > > > > > > Always

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-intel tree

On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 09:19:39AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote: > On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 04:05:59PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 09:36:56AM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > > > Hi Matt, > > > > > > Always use the dim tooling when applying patches, it will do the right > > >

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-intel tree

On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 04:05:59PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 09:36:56AM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > > Hi Matt, > > > > Always use the dim tooling when applying patches, it will do the right > > thing with regards to adding the S-o-b. > > fd.o server rejects any pus

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-intel tree

On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 09:36:56AM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > Hi Matt, > > Always use the dim tooling when applying patches, it will do the right > thing with regards to adding the S-o-b. fd.o server rejects any pushes that haven't been done by dim, so how did this get through? Matt, can you

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-intel tree

Hi Matt, Always use the dim tooling when applying patches, it will do the right thing with regards to adding the S-o-b. Regards, Joonas Quoting Stephen Rothwell (2021-07-15 07:18:54) > Hi all, > > Commit > > db47fe727e1f ("drm/i915/step: s/_revid_tbl/_revids") > > is missing a Signed-off-by

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-intel tree

Hi all, Commit db47fe727e1f ("drm/i915/step: s/_revid_tbl/_revids") is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell pgpLlySaYdecR.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-intel tree

Hi all, Commit 8e525cb4a622 ("drm/i915/execlists: Move RPCS setup to context pin") is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell pgpCvtnpeFPUo.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-intel tree

On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 04:00:34PM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 06:59:29AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Commit > > > > 35b876db4a42 ("drm/i915/dsc: Add slice_row_per_frame in DSC PPS > > programming") > > > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its co

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-intel tree

On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 06:59:29AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Commit > > 35b876db4a42 ("drm/i915/dsc: Add slice_row_per_frame in DSC PPS > programming") > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer. It seems the tag "Suggested-by:" tricked out our maintainer tools. fr

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-intel tree

Hi all, Commit 35b876db4a42 ("drm/i915/dsc: Add slice_row_per_frame in DSC PPS programming") is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell pgpS8_YJUjABc.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ dri-devel mailing