Re: i2c handling in nouveau driver

2012-03-16 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Ben, I'm sorry for the very very late reply. Please do not jump to the conclusion that I do not care - I do! Just I am very busy, just as you. On Wednesday 11 January 2012 01:40:58 pm Ben Skeggs wrote: > On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 11:17 +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > In the commit message, you com

i2c handling in nouveau driver

2012-03-15 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Ben, I'm sorry for the very very late reply. Please do not jump to the conclusion that I do not care - I do! Just I am very busy, just as you. On Wednesday 11 January 2012 01:40:58 pm Ben Skeggs wrote: > On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 11:17 +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > In the commit message, you com

i2c handling in nouveau driver

2012-01-11 Thread Ben Skeggs
On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 11:17 +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Ben, Hi Jean, > > I see in commit f553b79c03f0dbd52f6f03abe8233a2bef8cbd0d that you just > changed the nouveau driver to use an internal i2c bit-banging > implementation instead of i2c-algo-bit. Let me say here publicly that I > disap

i2c handling in nouveau driver

2012-01-11 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Ben, I see in commit f553b79c03f0dbd52f6f03abe8233a2bef8cbd0d that you just changed the nouveau driver to use an internal i2c bit-banging implementation instead of i2c-algo-bit. Let me say here publicly that I disapprove this change. I believe this is a move in the wrong direction. Just bec

i2c handling in nouveau driver

2012-01-11 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Ben, I see in commit f553b79c03f0dbd52f6f03abe8233a2bef8cbd0d that you just changed the nouveau driver to use an internal i2c bit-banging implementation instead of i2c-algo-bit. Let me say here publicly that I disapprove this change. I believe this is a move in the wrong direction. Just bec

Re: i2c handling in nouveau driver

2012-01-11 Thread Ben Skeggs
On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 11:17 +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Ben, Hi Jean, > > I see in commit f553b79c03f0dbd52f6f03abe8233a2bef8cbd0d that you just > changed the nouveau driver to use an internal i2c bit-banging > implementation instead of i2c-algo-bit. Let me say here publicly that I > disap