Hi
On 2015-06-08, Ander Conselvan De Oliveira wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 11:06 +0300, Ander Conselvan De Oliveira wrote:
> > On Sun, 2015-06-07 at 04:32 +0200, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> > > On 2015-06-07, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 11:18:21PM +0200, Stefan Li
On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 11:06 +0300, Ander Conselvan De Oliveira wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-06-07 at 04:32 +0200, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On 2015-06-07, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 11:18:21PM +0200, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > >
On Sun, 2015-06-07 at 04:32 +0200, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 2015-06-07, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 11:18:21PM +0200, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > On 2015-04-20, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > The following changes since comm
> This commit introduces a regression relative to v4.0 on an Intel
> D945GCLF2 mainboard[1] (Atom 330) with Intel 82945G/GZ onboard graphics
> using its (only-) VGA connector for me.
>
Jani any ideas/plans?
Dave.
> v4.1-rc6-52-gff25ea8:
> [ 13.265699] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer
Hi
On 2015-06-07, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 11:18:21PM +0200, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On 2015-04-20, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > [...]
> > > The following changes since commit
> > > 09d51602cf84a1264946711dd4ea0dddbac599a1:
> > >
> > > Merge branch 'tur
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 11:18:21PM +0200, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 2015-04-20, Dave Airlie wrote:
> [...]
> > The following changes since commit 09d51602cf84a1264946711dd4ea0dddbac599a1:
> >
> > Merge branch 'turbostat' of
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/len
Hi
On 2015-04-20, Dave Airlie wrote:
[...]
> The following changes since commit 09d51602cf84a1264946711dd4ea0dddbac599a1:
>
> Merge branch 'turbostat' of
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux (2015-04-19 14:31:41
> -0700)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
>
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Matthew]
>
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 09:07:45AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> Hmm. The odd Intel PCI resource mess is back.
>>
>> Or maybe it never went away.
>>
>> I get these when suspending. Things *work*, but it's really spamming
>
[+cc Matthew]
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 09:07:45AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Hmm. The odd Intel PCI resource mess is back.
>
> Or maybe it never went away.
>
> I get these when suspending. Things *work*, but it's really spamming
> my logs a fair bit:
>
> i915 :00:02.0: BAR 6: [??? 0x00
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> I'm not sure why we want that IORESOURCE_ROM_SHADOW thing at all, but
> yes, if what this is all about is the magic video ROM at 0xc, then
It's used in the PCI layer to say "Read from 0xc rather than the
ROM BAR" and then ends up a
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Matthew Garrett
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>
>> int pcibios_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> {
>> if (dev-is-default-vga-device) {
>> dev->rom = 0xC;
>> dev->romlen = 0x2;
>> }
>
> I don't know
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> Your i915 does not have a ROM BAR in hardware. If the default video
> device has no ROM BAR, pci_fixup_video() sets IORESOURCE_ROM_SHADOW
> even though the resource flags are zero because the BAR itself doesn't
> exist.
>
> If IORESOURCE_RO
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> Hmm. The odd Intel PCI resource mess is back.
>
> Or maybe it never went away.
>
> I get these when suspending. Things *work*, but it's really spamming
> my logs a fair bit:
>
> i915 :00:02.0: BAR 6: [??? 0x flags 0x2] has bog
Hmm. The odd Intel PCI resource mess is back.
Or maybe it never went away.
I get these when suspending. Things *work*, but it's really spamming
my logs a fair bit:
i915 :00:02.0: BAR 6: [??? 0x flags 0x2] has bogus alignment
pci_bus :01: Allocating resources
pci_bus :02
Hi Linus,
First up, this tree contains a backmerge of your tree, as it merges cleanly
but then fails to build on ARM due to an API change, I've included the
fixed up patch in the merge commit.
The unmerged, unfixed tree is in my drm-next branch if you want to confirm
things. The fixup is 3 trivi
15 matches
Mail list logo