Re: drm scheduler and wq flavours

2024-05-08 Thread Matthew Brost
On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 10:09:18AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > On 07/05/2024 00:23, Matthew Brost wrote: > > On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 03:33:50PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Continuing after the brief IRC discussion yesterday regarding work queues > > > being

Re: drm scheduler and wq flavours

2024-05-07 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 07/05/2024 00:23, Matthew Brost wrote: On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 03:33:50PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: Hi all, Continuing after the brief IRC discussion yesterday regarding work queues being prone to deadlocks or not, I had a browse around the code base and ended up a bit confused. When

Re: drm scheduler and wq flavours

2024-05-06 Thread Matthew Brost
On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 03:33:50PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > Hi all, > > Continuing after the brief IRC discussion yesterday regarding work queues > being prone to deadlocks or not, I had a browse around the code base and > ended up a bit confused. > > When drm_sched_init documents and al

drm scheduler and wq flavours

2024-05-02 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
Hi all, Continuing after the brief IRC discussion yesterday regarding work queues being prone to deadlocks or not, I had a browse around the code base and ended up a bit confused. When drm_sched_init documents and allocates an *ordered* wq, if no custom one was provided, could someone remi