Thanks David,
Initially I thought we could run into wait issues with a dma_fence_chain
with a value = 0, but you're right, it works fine.
We could just avoid to create a dma_fence_chain object, but maybe we
don't care.
-Lionel
On 21/05/2019 09:51, zhoucm1 wrote:
Sorry for late response.
Sorry for late response.
Although we don't expect that, drm_syncobj_timeline_signal_ioctl already
handle this case I think. Which can handle both (point value > 0) and
(point value = 0).
-David
On 2019年05月21日 16:44, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
[CAUTION: External Email]
Ping?
On 16/05/2019
Ping?
On 16/05/2019 15:49, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
Hi all,
While picking up the IGT tests for timeline syncobj,
I noticed that although we deal with multi wait across both timeline
(with point value > 0) and binary (point value = 0) syncobjs,
we don't seem to have a similar behavior with sig
Hi all,
While picking up the IGT tests for timeline syncobj,
I noticed that although we deal with multi wait across both timeline
(with point value > 0) and binary (point value = 0) syncobjs,
we don't seem to have a similar behavior with signaling.
Do you have any thought on this?
I'm consider
