On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 8:14 PM Alex Lanzano wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 08:04:41PM -0500, Alex Lanzano wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 10:29:29AM +0100, Josef Luštický wrote:
> > > Hello Alex,
> > > there is a bug in mipi_dbi_hw_reset() function that implements the logic
> > > of
> > >
On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 08:04:41PM -0500, Alex Lanzano wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 10:29:29AM +0100, Josef Luštický wrote:
> > Hello Alex,
> > there is a bug in mipi_dbi_hw_reset() function that implements the logic of
> > display reset contrary.
> > It keeps the reset line activated which kee
On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 10:29:29AM +0100, Josef Luštický wrote:
> Hello Alex,
> there is a bug in mipi_dbi_hw_reset() function that implements the logic of
> display reset contrary.
> It keeps the reset line activated which keeps displays in reset state.
>
> I reported the bug to
> https://gitlab.
Hello Alex,
there is a bug in mipi_dbi_hw_reset() function that implements the logic of
display reset contrary.
It keeps the reset line activated which keeps displays in reset state.
I reported the bug to
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/misc/kernel/-/issues/63
Unfortunately, fixing the bug wou
