Hi Akshay,
On 9 February 2016 at 22:25, Akshay Bhat wrote:
> On 02/09/2016 04:28 PM, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> On 1 February 2016 at 19:02, Akshay Bhat wrote:
>>> On 02/01/2016 07:11 AM, Liviu Dudau wrote:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 05:12:28PM -0500, Akshay Bhat wrote:
> On 01/28/2016 05:29 P
Hi Akshay,
On 1 February 2016 at 19:02, Akshay Bhat wrote:
> On 02/01/2016 07:11 AM, Liviu Dudau wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 05:12:28PM -0500, Akshay Bhat wrote:
>>> On 01/28/2016 05:29 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> Also from the original log you can see that there are a lot of modules
>>> that
Hi Daniel,
On 02/09/2016 04:28 PM, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi Akshay,
>
> On 1 February 2016 at 19:02, Akshay Bhat wrote:
>> On 02/01/2016 07:11 AM, Liviu Dudau wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 05:12:28PM -0500, Akshay Bhat wrote:
On 01/28/2016 05:29 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
Also from the o
On 02/01/2016 07:11 AM, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 05:12:28PM -0500, Akshay Bhat wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 01/28/2016 05:29 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> can't really say if that is the issue in this case, but these are the
>>> symptoms you'd see if the kernel was built without some driver
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 05:12:28PM -0500, Akshay Bhat wrote:
>
>
> On 01/28/2016 05:29 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> >can't really say if that is the issue in this case, but these are the
> >symptoms you'd see if the kernel was built without some driver that
> >imx-drm depends on[1]. The kernel will on
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> can't really say if that is the issue in this case, but these are the
> symptoms you'd see if the kernel was built without some driver that
> imx-drm depends on[1]. The kernel will only try to reprobe a driver
> if some other driver has loaded s
On 01/28/2016 05:29 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> can't really say if that is the issue in this case, but these are the
> symptoms you'd see if the kernel was built without some driver that
> imx-drm depends on[1]. The kernel will only try to reprobe a driver
> if some other driver has loaded since it
can't really say if that is the issue in this case, but these are the
symptoms you'd see if the kernel was built without some driver that
imx-drm depends on[1]. The kernel will only try to reprobe a driver
if some other driver has loaded since it last deferred (otherwise, it
would be pointless, yo
Hi,
There appears to be a bug in kernel where after a probe deferral by the
drm driver, the deferred drm function is never called again at a later
point.
I have a iMX6 based board where there is pca9547 i2c mux between the
display and the mx6 processor. The drm driver tries to get EDID
inform
