On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Alexander Y. Fomichev
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Alex Deucher
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Alexander Y. Fomichev
>>> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Alex Deu
On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 01:07 +0400, Alexander Y. Fomichev wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Alex Deucher
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Alexander Y. Fomichev
> > wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Alex Deucher
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 5:42 PM, A
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Alexander Y. Fomichev
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Alex Deucher
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Alexander Y. Fomichev
>>> wrote:
This patch fix possible NULL pointer dere
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Alexander Y. Fomichev
> wrote:
>> This patch fix possible NULL pointer dereference when
>> r600_prepare_blit_copy tries to fill dev_priv->blit_vb->file_priv
>> without check of dev_priv->blit_vb. dev_priv->bli
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Alexander Y. Fomichev
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Alexander Y. Fomichev
>>> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Alex Deucher
On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 01:07 +0400, Alexander Y. Fomichev wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Alexander Y. Fomichev
> > wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Alex Deucher
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Alex
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Alexander Y. Fomichev
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Alex Deucher
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Alexander Y. Fomichev
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Alex Deucher
>>> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Alexand
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Alexander Y. Fomichev
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Alex Deucher
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Alexander Y. Fomichev
>> wrote:
>>> This patch fix possible NULL pointer dereference when
>>> r600_prepare_blit_copy tries to fill dev_priv-
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Alexander Y. Fomichev
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Alexander Y. Fomichev
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Alexander Y. Fo
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Alexander Y. Fomichev
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Alexander Y. Fomichev
>>> wrote:
This patch fix possible NULL pointer derefere
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Alexander Y. Fomichev
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Alexander Y. Fomichev
>> wrote:
>>> This patch fix possible NULL pointer dereference when
>>> r600_prepare_blit_copy tries to fill dev_priv->bl
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Alexander Y. Fomichev
wrote:
> This patch fix possible NULL pointer dereference when
> r600_prepare_blit_copy tries to fill dev_priv->blit_vb->file_priv
> without check of dev_priv->blit_vb. dev_priv->blit_vb should be
> filled by r600_nomm_get_vb but latest can fa
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Alexander Y. Fomichev
> wrote:
>> This patch fix possible NULL pointer dereference when
>> r600_prepare_blit_copy tries to fill dev_priv->blit_vb->file_priv
>> without check of dev_priv->blit_vb. dev_priv->bli
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Alexander Y. Fomichev
wrote:
> This patch fix possible NULL pointer dereference when
> r600_prepare_blit_copy tries to fill dev_priv->blit_vb->file_priv
> without check of dev_priv->blit_vb. dev_priv->blit_vb should be
> filled by r600_nomm_get_vb but latest can fa
This patch fix possible NULL pointer dereference when
r600_prepare_blit_copy tries to fill dev_priv->blit_vb->file_priv
without check of dev_priv->blit_vb. dev_priv->blit_vb should be
filled by r600_nomm_get_vb but latest can fail with EAGAIN.
Addresses: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=
This patch fix possible NULL pointer dereference when
r600_prepare_blit_copy tries to fill dev_priv->blit_vb->file_priv
without check of dev_priv->blit_vb. dev_priv->blit_vb should be
filled by r600_nomm_get_vb but latest can fail with EAGAIN.
Addresses: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=
16 matches
Mail list logo