[drm-intel:for-linux-next 3/3] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c:3317:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'wbinvd_on_all_cpus'; did you mean 'wrmsr_on_cpus'?

2019-08-21 Thread kbuild test robot
>>): drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c: In function 'ggtt_restore_mappings': >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c:3317:3: error: implicit declaration of >> function 'wbinvd_on_all_cpus'; did you mean 'wrmsr_on_cpus'? >> [-Werror=i

[drm-intel:for-linux-next 18/27] drivers/gpu//drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c:1087: error: 'iter' is used uninitialized in this function

2017-10-09 Thread kbuild test robot
(Debian 4.4.7-8) 4.4.7 reproduce: git checkout 0a03852e049af91da9ae70326c44bb5d9b0d377a # save the attached .config to linux build tree make ARCH=x86_64 All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): cc1: warnings being treated as errors drivers/gpu//drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt

[drm-intel:for-linux-next 18/27] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c:1087: warning: 'iter' is used uninitialized in this function

2017-10-07 Thread kbuild test robot
(Debian 4.4.7-8) 4.4.7 reproduce: git checkout 0a03852e049af91da9ae70326c44bb5d9b0d377a # save the attached .config to linux build tree make ARCH=x86_64 All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c: In function 'gen8_ppgtt_

[drm-intel:drm-intel-next-queued 3/23] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c:964: error: 'iter.sg' is used uninitialized in this function

2017-02-18 Thread kbuild test robot
m/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c: In function 'gen8_ppgtt_insert_4lvl': >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c:964: error: 'iter.sg' is used >> uninitialized in this function >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c:965: error: 'iter.dma' is used >> uninitialized

[drm-intel:drm-intel-next-queued 3/23] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c:964: warning: 'iter.sg' is used uninitialized in this function

2017-02-15 Thread kbuild test robot
: gcc-4.4 (Debian 4.4.7-8) 4.4.7 reproduce: git checkout 894ccebee2b0e606ba9638d20dd87b33568482d7 # save the attached .config to linux build tree make ARCH=x86_64 All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c: In fu

[drm-intel:for-linux-next 2/4] htmldocs: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c:3586: warning: No description found for parameter 'offset'

2017-01-11 Thread kbuild test robot
r 'driver_features' include/drm/drm_drv.h:441: warning: No description found for parameter 'dev_priv_size' include/drm/drm_drv.h:441: warning: No description found for parameter 'ioctls' include/drm/drm_drv.h:441: warning: No description found for parameter

[drm-intel:for-linux-next 1/4] htmldocs: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c:3594: warning: No description found for parameter 'vm'

2017-01-11 Thread kbuild test robot
ver_features' include/drm/drm_drv.h:441: warning: No description found for parameter 'dev_priv_size' include/drm/drm_drv.h:441: warning: No description found for parameter 'ioctls' include/drm/drm_drv.h:441: warning: No description found for parameter '

[drm-intel:drm-intel-nightly 922/930] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c:2732:9: note: in expansion of macro 'list_first_entry_or_null'

2016-12-16 Thread kbuild test robot
/linux/seq_file.h:7, from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c:26: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c: In function 'i915_gtt_color_adjust': >> include/linux/list.h:385:29: warning: initialization discards 'const' >> qualifier from point

[Intel-gfx] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c

2015-05-26 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 7:32 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: >> I'm not sure what is the approved way of fixing this. Perhaps >> disabling CONFIG_DRM_I915_WERROR when CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST=y. > > Maybe the answer right now is to just drop that config. Daniel? Agreed, that little experiment doesn't seem to

[Intel-gfx] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c

2015-05-25 Thread Jani Nikula
On Sat, 23 May 2015, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sat, 23 May 2015 14:30:09 +0100 Damien Lespiau intel.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 02:17:32PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: >> > I'm not sure what's happened to the drm code in linux-next - it's >> > exploding all over the place. Did someon

[Intel-gfx] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c

2015-05-23 Thread Damien Lespiau
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 02:17:32PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > I'm not sure what's happened to the drm code in linux-next - it's > exploding all over the place. Did someone turn on -Werror without > doing anywhere near enough testing? > > Anyway, I don't know how to fix this i386 build error:

[Intel-gfx] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c

2015-05-23 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sat, 23 May 2015 14:30:09 +0100 Damien Lespiau wrote: > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 02:17:32PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > I'm not sure what's happened to the drm code in linux-next - it's > > exploding all over the place. Did someone turn on -Werror without > > doing anywhere near enough te

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c

2015-05-22 Thread Andrew Morton
I'm not sure what's happened to the drm code in linux-next - it's exploding all over the place. Did someone turn on -Werror without doing anywhere near enough testing? Anyway, I don't know how to fix this i386 build error: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c: In funct

[drm-intel:drm-intel-next-queued 255/259] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c:366:36: sparse: dereference of noderef expression

2012-11-06 Thread Fengguang Wu
/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c:366:36: sparse: dereference of noderef expression vim +366 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c a1e0e546 Ben Widawsky 2012-11-04 350 { a1e0e546 Ben Widawsky 2012-11-04 351 struct drm_device *dev = obj->base.dev; a1e0e546 Ben Widawsky 2012-11-04 352 str

[drm-intel:drm-intel-next-queued 255/259] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c:366:36: sparse: dereference of noderef expression

2012-11-05 Thread Fengguang Wu
/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c:366:36: sparse: dereference of noderef expression vim +366 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c a1e0e546 Ben Widawsky 2012-11-04 350 { a1e0e546 Ben Widawsky 2012-11-04 351 struct drm_device *dev = obj->base.dev; a1e0e546 Ben Widawsky 2012-11-04 352 str