Hi Dmitry,
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 12:27:04PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 2:30 AM Boqun Feng wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 07:21:18AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 11:03:20AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 5:16 PM Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> In my experience, lockdep will indeed complain if an interrupt handler
> returns while in an RCU read-side critical section.
Can't we add lock status checks into the beginning and the end of interrupt
handler functions
(e.g. whether "stru
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 5:10 PM Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 11:03:20 +0100
> Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> > I think we're tripping over the might_sleep() all the mutexes have,
> > and that's not as good as yours, but good enough to catch a missing
> > rcu_read_unlock(). That's kinda
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 11:03:20 +0100
Daniel Vetter wrote:
> I think we're tripping over the might_sleep() all the mutexes have,
> and that's not as good as yours, but good enough to catch a missing
> rcu_read_unlock(). That's kinda why I'm baffled, since like almost
> every 2nd function in the back
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 07:21:18AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 11:03:20AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 5:16 PM Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 10:52:06AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 11:03:20AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 5:16 PM Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 10:52:06AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 2:14 AM syzbot
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > syzbot f
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 5:16 PM Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 10:52:06AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 2:14 AM syzbot
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > syzbot found the following issue on:
> > >
> > > HEAD commit:94801e5c Merge tag 'pinc
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 10:52:06AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 2:14 AM syzbot
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > syzbot found the following issue on:
> >
> > HEAD commit:94801e5c Merge tag 'pinctrl-v5.10-3' of git://git.kernel.o..
> > git tree: upstream
> > console
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 2:14 AM syzbot
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> syzbot found the following issue on:
>
> HEAD commit:94801e5c Merge tag 'pinctrl-v5.10-3' of git://git.kernel.o..
> git tree: upstream
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=130558c550
> kernel config:
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit:94801e5c Merge tag 'pinctrl-v5.10-3' of git://git.kernel.o..
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=130558c550
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=ee8a1012a5314210
das
10 matches
Mail list logo