> > [ 245.003823] handlers:
> > [ 245.003838] [] azx_interrupt [snd_hda_intel]
> > [ 245.003841] Disabling IRQ #16
>
> Does /proc/interrupts show IRQ 16 being shared between snd_hda_intel
> and radeon? If not, this looks like a snd_hda_intel (or another driver
> sharing the IRQ) issue.
/proc/in
> > [ 245.003823] handlers:
> > [ 245.003838] [] azx_interrupt [snd_hda_intel]
> > [ 245.003841] Disabling IRQ #16
>
> Does /proc/interrupts show IRQ 16 being shared between snd_hda_intel
> and radeon? If not, this looks like a snd_hda_intel (or another driver
> sharing the IRQ) issue.
/proc/in
On Mit, 2012-11-21 at 14:24 +0100, Julian Wollrath wrote:
>
> while having problems with the resume of the snd-hda-intel driver, I
> found the following in my dmesg output:
> [ 245.003310] irq 16: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
[...]
> [ 245.003823] handlers:
> [ 245.003
Hello,
while having problems with the resume of the snd-hda-intel driver, I
found the following in my dmesg output:
[ 245.003310] irq 16: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
[ 245.003318] Pid: 691, comm: kworker/u:3 Tainted: G C 3.7.0-rc6-wl+
#3
[ 245.003321] Call Tr
On Mit, 2012-11-21 at 14:24 +0100, Julian Wollrath wrote:
>
> while having problems with the resume of the snd-hda-intel driver, I
> found the following in my dmesg output:
> [ 245.003310] irq 16: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
[...]
> [ 245.003823] handlers:
> [ 245.003
Hello,
while having problems with the resume of the snd-hda-intel driver, I
found the following in my dmesg output:
[ 245.003310] irq 16: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
[ 245.003318] Pid: 691, comm: kworker/u:3 Tainted: G C 3.7.0-rc6-wl+
#3
[ 245.003321] Call Tr
