[PATCH v8 11/12] drm/msm/a6xx: Enable preemption for tested a7xx targets

Initialize with 4 rings to enable preemption. Add the "preemption_enabled" module parameter to override this. Tested-by: Rob Clark Tested-by: Neil Armstrong # on SM8650-QRD Tested-by: Neil Armstrong # on SM8550-QRD Tested-by: Neil Armstrong # on SM8450-HDK Signed-off-by: Antonino

Re: Tested

Sorry, what patch are you referring to? Alex On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 4:04 AM wrote: > > I have tested this on my end and it resolves the 120hz problem. > > Tested-By: Ryan Houdek

Tested

I have tested this on my end and it resolves the 120hz problem. Tested-By: Ryan Houdek

[Bug 103550] system boots really slow with 4.9.x kernel or greater (tested on 4.14 rc7)

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103550 Martin Peres changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |MOVED Status|NEW

Re: [PATCH] drm/selftest:- Adding a new format(whose cpp=0) to be tested by igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch

/Ayan-Halder/drm-selftest-Adding-a-new-format-whose-cpp-0-to-be-tested-by-igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch/20190316-050437 config: x86_64-allmodconfig (attached as .config) compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.3.0-1) 7.3.0 reproduce: # save the attached .config to linux build tree make ARCH

Re: [PATCH] drm/selftest:- Adding a new format(whose cpp=0) to be tested by igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch

/Ayan-Halder/drm-selftest-Adding-a-new-format-whose-cpp-0-to-be-tested-by-igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch/20190316-050437 config: xtensa-allyesconfig (attached as .config) compiler: xtensa-linux-gcc (GCC) 8.1.0 reproduce: wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin

[PATCH] drm/selftest:- Adding a new format(whose cpp=0) to be tested by igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch

We have introduced some new formats DRM_FORMAT_VUY101010, DRM_FORMAT_YUV420_8BIT, and DRM_FORMAT_YUV420_10BIT whose cpp is 0 (as they are defined in bits per pixel). We need to ensure that the pitch returned by drm_format_info_min_pitch() for such formats is always 0. Signed-off-by: Ayan Kumar

Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: adjust tested variable

Am 27.01.2018 um 15:28 schrieb Julia Lawall: Check the variable that was most recently initialized. The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // @@ expression x, y, f, g, e, m; statement S1,S2,S3,S4; @@ x = f(...); if (\(<+...x...+>\&e\)) S1 else S

[PATCH] drm/radeon: adjust tested variable

Check the variable that was most recently initialized. The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // @@ expression x, y, f, g, e, m; statement S1,S2,S3,S4; @@ x = f(...); if (\(<+...x...+>\&e\)) S1 else S2 ( x = g(...); | m = g(...,&x,...); | y = g(..

[Bug 103550] system boots really slow with 4.9.x kernel or greater (tested on 4.14 rc7)

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103550 Daniel Stone changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Wayland |DRI Component|wayland

[PATCH] drm-misc: arm64 now also must be compile-tested before pushing

hisilicon unfortunately requires this since it's a warn-fest on 32bit builds. Cc: seanpaul at chromium.org Cc: sumit.semwal at linaro.org Cc: sumit.semwal at linaro.org Cc: architt at codeaurora.org Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- drm-misc.rst | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deleti

Radeon DPM branch successfully tested on Radeon HD 6310 (AMD Wrestler) (was: [pull] radeon drm-next-3.11)

> (2013-07-03 17:37:31 -0400) > > are available in the git repository at: > git://people.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux drm-next-3.11 [?] just a note that I tested that branch successfully on an ASRock E350M1 (with coreboot) and Radeon HD 6310. Setting the performance

Radeon DPM branch successfully tested on Radeon HD 6310 (AMD Wrestler) (was: [pull] radeon drm-next-3.11)

gt; (2013-07-03 17:37:31 -0400) > > are available in the git repository at: > git://people.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux drm-next-3.11 […] just a note that I tested that branch successfully on an ASRock E350M1 (with coreboot) and Radeon HD 6310. Setting the performance level also seems