On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 04:22:48PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Am 25.05.22 um 16:15 schrieb Daniel Stone:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, 25 May 2022 at 15:07, Simon Ser wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, May 25th, 2022 at 15:51, Daniel Vetter
> > > wrote:
> > > > > You can add that to the list of reasons
Am 25.05.22 um 16:15 schrieb Daniel Stone:
Hi,
On Wed, 25 May 2022 at 15:07, Simon Ser wrote:
On Wednesday, May 25th, 2022 at 15:51, Daniel Vetter wrote:
You can add that to the list of reasons why compositors need to stop
using buffers with unsignaled fences. There's plenty of other reasons
Hi,
On Wed, 25 May 2022 at 15:07, Simon Ser wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 25th, 2022 at 15:51, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > You can add that to the list of reasons why compositors need to stop
> > > using buffers with unsignaled fences. There's plenty of other reasons
> > > there already (the big one
On Wednesday, May 25th, 2022 at 15:51, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > Ofc in reality you can still flood your compositor and they're not very
> > > robust, but with umf it's trivial to just hang your compositor forever and
> > > nothing happens.
> >
> > You can add that to the list of reasons why com
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 03:28:41PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 2022-05-25 15:05, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 12:28:17PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> >> Am 09.05.22 um 16:10 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> >>> On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 08:56:41AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> >
Apologies I'm constantly behind on m-l discussions :-/
On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 12:28:17PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Am 09.05.22 um 16:10 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 08:56:41AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> > > Am 04.05.22 um 12:08 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > > > On Mo
Am 09.05.22 um 16:10 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 08:56:41AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
Am 04.05.22 um 12:08 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 06:37:07PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
Hello everyone,
it's a well known problem that the DMA-buf subsystem mixed
On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 08:56:41AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Am 04.05.22 um 12:08 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 06:37:07PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> > > Hello everyone,
> > >
> > > it's a well known problem that the DMA-buf subsystem mixed
> > > synchronization and
Am 04.05.22 um 12:08 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 06:37:07PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
Hello everyone,
it's a well known problem that the DMA-buf subsystem mixed
synchronization and memory management requirements into the same
dma_fence and dma_resv objects. Because of thi
On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 06:37:07PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> it's a well known problem that the DMA-buf subsystem mixed
> synchronization and memory management requirements into the same
> dma_fence and dma_resv objects. Because of this dma_fence objects need
> to guarant
Hello everyone,
it's a well known problem that the DMA-buf subsystem mixed synchronization and
memory management requirements into the same dma_fence and dma_resv objects.
Because of this dma_fence objects need to guarantee that they complete within a
finite amount of time or otherwise the syst
11 matches
Mail list logo
