On 2017-05-09 04:24 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 02:54:22PM -0400, Harry Wentland wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for taking the time to look at DC.
I had a couple more questions/comments in regard to the patch you posted on
IRC: http://paste.debian.net/plain/930704
My impressi
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 02:54:22PM -0400, Harry Wentland wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Thanks for taking the time to look at DC.
>
> I had a couple more questions/comments in regard to the patch you posted on
> IRC: http://paste.debian.net/plain/930704
>
> My impression is that this item is the most i
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 03:50:36PM -0400, Harry Wentland wrote:
>
>
> On 2017-05-08 03:07 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > On 9 May 2017 at 04:54, Harry Wentland wrote:
> > > Hi Daniel,
> > >
> > > Thanks for taking the time to look at DC.
> > >
> > > I had a couple more questions/comments in regard
On 2017-05-08 03:07 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
On 9 May 2017 at 04:54, Harry Wentland wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for taking the time to look at DC.
I had a couple more questions/comments in regard to the patch you posted on
IRC: http://paste.debian.net/plain/930704
My impression is that this ite
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for taking the time to look at DC.
I had a couple more questions/comments in regard to the patch you posted
on IRC: http://paste.debian.net/plain/930704
My impression is that this item is the most important next step for us:
From a quick glance I think what we want ins
On 9 May 2017 at 04:54, Harry Wentland wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Thanks for taking the time to look at DC.
>
> I had a couple more questions/comments in regard to the patch you posted on
> IRC: http://paste.debian.net/plain/930704
>
> My impression is that this item is the most important next step f
On 2017-05-03 11:02 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 04:26:51PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
Hi Harry,
while this looks more and more like it could work something which would
really help would be to have a set of patches squashed together and rebased
on drm-next.
The dc-drm-
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 04:26:51PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Hi Harry,
>
> while this looks more and more like it could work something which would
> really help would be to have a set of patches squashed together and rebased
> on drm-next.
>
> The dc-drm-next-atomic-wip looks like a start,
Hi all,
Over the last few months we (mostly Andrey and myself) have taken and
addressed some of the feedback received from December's DC RFC. A lot of
our work so far centers around atomic. We were able to take a whole
bunch of the areas where we rolled our own solution and use DRM atomic
hel
Hi Harry,
while this looks more and more like it could work something which would
really help would be to have a set of patches squashed together and
rebased on drm-next.
The dc-drm-next-atomic-wip looks like a start, but we need more
something like:
drm/amdgpu: add base DC components
drm/a
10 matches
Mail list logo
