Report for 2.6.35-rc3-00262-g984bc96

2010-07-07 Thread Nico Schottelius
Andrew Morton [Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 07:42:22PM -0700]: > On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 09:40:52 +0200 Nico Schottelius schottelius.org> wrote: > > > Good morning! > > > > A short report on what's broken in 2.6.35-rc3-00262-g984bc96 with > > the Lenovo X201: > > So you see two post-2.6.34 regressions? I'm

Re: Report for 2.6.35-rc3-00262-g984bc96

2010-07-07 Thread Nico Schottelius
Andrew Morton [Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 07:42:22PM -0700]: > On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 09:40:52 +0200 Nico Schottelius > wrote: > > > Good morning! > > > > A short report on what's broken in 2.6.35-rc3-00262-g984bc96 with > > the Lenovo X201: > > So you see two post-2.6.34 regressions? I'm not 100% sure

Re: Report for 2.6.35-rc3-00262-g984bc96

2010-07-06 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 09:40:52 +0200 Nico Schottelius wrote: > Good morning! > > A short report on what's broken in 2.6.35-rc3-00262-g984bc96 with > the Lenovo X201: So you see two post-2.6.34 regressions? > == xrandr == > > After using xrandr several times in xorg, the screen gets > "fancy": b

Report for 2.6.35-rc3-00262-g984bc96

2010-07-06 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 09:40:52 +0200 Nico Schottelius wrote: > Good morning! > > A short report on what's broken in 2.6.35-rc3-00262-g984bc96 with > the Lenovo X201: So you see two post-2.6.34 regressions? > == xrandr == > > After using xrandr several times in xorg, the screen gets > "fancy": bl