On 20/12/2013 10:55, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> On 12/20/2013 10:31 AM, Martin Peres wrote:
>> On 20/12/2013 07:57, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
>>> So this is a potential issue that needs to be brought up sooner or
>>> later:
>>>
>>> Let's say a client is authenticated by the current master.
>>> Then th
On 12/20/2013 10:31 AM, Martin Peres wrote:
> On 20/12/2013 07:57, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
>> So this is a potential issue that needs to be brought up sooner or
>> later:
>>
>> Let's say a client is authenticated by the current master.
>> Then the master drops, and we have a new master (fast user s
On 20/12/2013 07:57, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> So this is a potential issue that needs to be brought up sooner or later:
>
> Let's say a client is authenticated by the current master.
> Then the master drops, and we have a new master (fast user switching for
> example).
>
> What's the status of the
So this is a potential issue that needs to be brought up sooner or later:
Let's say a client is authenticated by the current master.
Then the master drops, and we have a new master (fast user switching for
example).
What's the status of the clients authenticated by old masters?
Should they be all
