Re: drm core/helpers and MIT license

2019-11-18 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 1:34 PM Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 08:01:32PM +, co...@sdf.org wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > I don't think we can make any complaints about GPL being more widely > > used in the DRM code. It's nice to have the code at all, the MIT license > > is a

Re: drm core/helpers and MIT license

2019-11-16 Thread Noralf Trønnes
Den 16.11.2019 12.57, skrev Emmanuel Vadot: > On Fri, 15 Nov 2019 15:33:46 +0100 > Noralf Trønnes wrote: > >> >> >> Den 15.11.2019 13.34, skrev Ville Syrjälä: >>> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 08:01:32PM +, co...@sdf.org wrote: Hi Daniel, I don't think we can make any complaints ab

Re: drm core/helpers and MIT license

2019-11-16 Thread Emmanuel Vadot
Hi Daniel, On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 16:03:33 +0100 Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi all, > > Dave and me chatted about this last week on irc. Essentially we have: > > $ git grep SPDX.*GPL -- ':(glob)drivers/gpu/drm/*c' > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client.c:// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > drivers/gpu/drm/

Re: drm core/helpers and MIT license

2019-11-16 Thread Emmanuel Vadot
On Fri, 15 Nov 2019 15:33:46 +0100 Noralf Trønnes wrote: > > > Den 15.11.2019 13.34, skrev Ville Syrjälä: > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 08:01:32PM +, co...@sdf.org wrote: > >> Hi Daniel, > >> > >> I don't think we can make any complaints about GPL being more widely > >> used in the DRM code.

Re: drm core/helpers and MIT license

2019-11-15 Thread Alex Deucher
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 10:03 AM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Hi all, > > Dave and me chatted about this last week on irc. Essentially we have: > > $ git grep SPDX.*GPL -- ':(glob)drivers/gpu/drm/*c' > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client.c:// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_damage_helper

Re: drm core/helpers and MIT license

2019-11-15 Thread Noralf Trønnes
Den 15.11.2019 13.34, skrev Ville Syrjälä: > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 08:01:32PM +, co...@sdf.org wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> >> I don't think we can make any complaints about GPL being more widely >> used in the DRM code. It's nice to have the code at all, the MIT license >> is a bonus. Thanks fo

Re: drm core/helpers and MIT license

2019-11-15 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 08:01:32PM +, co...@sdf.org wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > I don't think we can make any complaints about GPL being more widely > used in the DRM code. It's nice to have the code at all, the MIT license > is a bonus. Thanks for writing it and bearing with us. > > Would rewrit

Re: drm core/helpers and MIT license

2019-11-15 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 08:01:32PM +, co...@sdf.org wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > I don't think we can make any complaints about GPL being more widely > used in the DRM code. It's nice to have the code at all, the MIT license > is a bonus. Thanks for writing it and bearing with us. > > Would rewrit

Re: drm core/helpers and MIT license

2019-11-15 Thread coypu
Hi Daniel, I don't think we can make any complaints about GPL being more widely used in the DRM code. It's nice to have the code at all, the MIT license is a bonus. Thanks for writing it and bearing with us. Would rewrites done purely for licensing reasons be accepted upstream? __

Re: drm core/helpers and MIT license

2019-11-14 Thread Simon Ser
Adding zeis...@freebsd.org for FreeBSD. I'll try to see if I can ping some NetBSD/OpenBSD folks too. On Tuesday, November 12, 2019 4:03 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi all, > > Dave and me chatted about this last week on irc. Essentially we have: > > $ git grep SPDX.*GPL -- ':(glob)drivers/gpu/dr