Re: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe: skip building debugfs code for CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=n

2024-02-26 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > Looking at drm-intel and drm-misc, they are using a special > for-linux-next. We may eventually adopt the same workflow, but I will > have to check with other maintainers. The idea is to try to better reflect what's actually going to next. For example

Re: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe: skip building debugfs code for CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=n

2024-02-21 Thread Lucas De Marchi
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 05:21:17PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi Lucas, On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 23:29:54 -0600 Lucas De Marchi wrote: Looking at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=2d5c7b7eb345249cb34d42cbc2b97b4c57ea944e it seems we still don't ha

Re: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe: skip building debugfs code for CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=n

2024-02-20 Thread Lucas De Marchi
+Stephen On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 03:58:54PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Tue, Feb 13, 2024, at 15:55, Jani Nikula wrote: On Tue, 13 Feb 2024, Arnd Bergmann wrote: From: Arnd Bergmann Some of the debugfs functions are stubbed out in these configurations, so trying to build the .c file with