Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-30 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 10:49:33 +0800 (SGT), Jeff Chua wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 4:16 AM, Jesse Barnes > wrote: > > > Randy, Jeff and Alex, does the below help at all? If so, it may be the > > minimal fix we want for 2.6.37. > > Jesse, > > Yes, that worked for me. I improved on the p

Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-30 Thread Chris Wilson
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 11:40:04 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Randy Dunlap > wrote: > > > > The only significant difference that I can see in the kernel message log > > is this: > > Hmm. I suspect that difference should have gone away with commit > 92971021c6328

Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-30 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 10:49:33 +0800 (SGT) Jeff Chua wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 4:16 AM, Jesse Barnes > wrote: > > > Randy, Jeff and Alex, does the below help at all? If so, it may be the > > minimal fix we want for 2.6.37. > > Jesse, > > Yes, that worked for me. I improved on the pa

Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Jeff Chua
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 4:16 AM, Jesse Barnes wrote: Randy, Jeff and Alex, does the below help at all? If so, it may be the minimal fix we want for 2.6.37. Jesse, Yes, that worked for me. I improved on the patch a bit below. Thanks, Jeff --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c 2010-12

Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Alex Riesen
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 01:02, Jesse Barnes wrote: > That's the easiest way; I think there are existing packages available > as well, but you may have to check Karmic or newer. Never mind. I'm lazy (that's not to say someone is too). I redid the test: Before running "xset dpms force standby":

Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 00:35:15 +0100 Alex Riesen wrote: > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 00:20, Alex Riesen wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 00:13, Jesse Barnes > > wrote: > >>> After closing and opening the lid (displays backlight is back) > >>> > >>>   http://vin-soft.org/~raa/public/test/intel_gpu

Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 14:46:14 -0800 Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios > > > index 2b20786..d27d016 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c > > > @@ -263,6 +263,

Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Alex Riesen
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 00:20, Alex Riesen wrote: > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 00:13, Jesse Barnes wrote: >>> After closing and opening the lid (displays backlight is back) >>> >>>   http://vin-soft.org/~raa/public/test/intel_gpu_dump-after-lid >> >> I need the intel_reg_dumper output, not intel_gpu

Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Alex Riesen
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 00:13, Jesse Barnes wrote: >> After closing and opening the lid (displays backlight is back) >> >>   http://vin-soft.org/~raa/public/test/intel_gpu_dump-after-lid > > I need the intel_reg_dumper output, not intel_gpu_dump. :) > Hmm, there is no intel_reg_dumper in intel-gp

Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 00:09:56 +0100 Alex Riesen wrote: > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 22:53, Jesse Barnes wrote: > >> > Doesn't change anything here. Display stays blank. > >> > >> Sounds like your problem is separate from SSC then, more likely related > >> to panel power or backlight control.  Have y

Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Alex Riesen
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 22:53, Jesse Barnes wrote: >> > Doesn't change anything here. Display stays blank. >> >> Sounds like your problem is separate from SSC then, more likely related >> to panel power or backlight control.  Have you tried bisecting for the >> problem between 2.6.35 and 2.6.36? >

Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Jesse Barnes
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios > > index 2b20786..d27d016 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c > > @@ -263,6 +263,9 @@ parse_general_features(struct drm_i915_private > > *dev_priv,

Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 12:16:01 -0800 Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 11:40:04 -0800 > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Randy Dunlap > > wrote: > > > > > > The only significant difference that I can see in the kernel message log > > > is this: > > > > Hmm.

Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Alex Riesen
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 22:18, Jesse Barnes wrote: >> > +               if (IS_GEN5(dev) || IS_GEN6(dev)) >> > +                       dev_priv->lvds_use_ssc = 0; >> >> Doesn't change anything here. Display stays blank. > > Sounds like your problem is separate from SSC then, more likely related >

Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Jesse Barnes
> > Doesn't change anything here. Display stays blank. > > Sounds like your problem is separate from SSC then, more likely related > to panel power or backlight control. Have you tried bisecting for the > problem between 2.6.35 and 2.6.36? Nevermind, I just checked out the bug, looks like it is

Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 22:11:09 +0100 Alex Riesen wrote: > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 21:16, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 11:40:04 -0800 > > Linus Torvalds wrote: > >> Chris - why did that lvds_ssc_freq thing suddenly start mattering? Can > >> we please just disable spread-spectrum ent

Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Alex Riesen
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 21:16, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 11:40:04 -0800 > Linus Torvalds wrote: >> Chris - why did that lvds_ssc_freq thing suddenly start mattering? Can >> we please just disable spread-spectrum entirely? Or perhaps only if we >> notice that it was enabled already

Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread François Valenduc
Le 29/12/10 21:16, Jesse Barnes a écrit : > On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 11:40:04 -0800 > Linus Torvalds wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Randy Dunlap >> wrote: >>> >>> The only significant difference that I can see in the kernel message log >>> is this: >> >> Hmm. I suspect that difference

Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 11:40:04 -0800 Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Randy Dunlap > wrote: > > > > The only significant difference that I can see in the kernel message log > > is this: > > Hmm. I suspect that difference should have gone away with commit > 92971021c6328

Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > The only significant difference that I can see in the kernel message log > is this: Hmm. I suspect that difference should have gone away with commit 92971021c6328 (Revert "drm: Don't try and disable an encoder that was never enabled"), but