On 03.05.2012 19:34, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Christian König wrote:
On 03.05.2012 19:20, Alex Deucher wrote:
2012/5/3 Jerome Glisse:
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Christian König
wrote:
On 03.05.2012 18:32, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:19
2012/5/3 Christian König :
> On 03.05.2012 19:20, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>
>> 2012/5/3 Jerome Glisse:
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Christian König
>>> wrote:
On 03.05.2012 18:32, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Christian
> König
> wrot
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Christian König wrote:
> On 03.05.2012 19:20, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>
>> 2012/5/3 Jerome Glisse:
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Christian König
>>> wrote:
On 03.05.2012 18:32, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Chri
On 03.05.2012 19:20, Alex Deucher wrote:
2012/5/3 Jerome Glisse:
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Christian König
wrote:
On 03.05.2012 18:32, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Christian König
wrote:
On 02.05.2012 18:01, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:11
2012/5/3 Jerome Glisse :
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Christian König
> wrote:
>> On 03.05.2012 18:32, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Christian König
>>> wrote:
On 02.05.2012 18:01, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Chri
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> 2012/5/3 Jerome Glisse :
>> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Christian König
>> wrote:
>>> On 03.05.2012 18:32, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Christian König
wrote:
>
> On 02.05.2012 18:01, Jerome
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Christian König
wrote:
> On 03.05.2012 18:32, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Christian König
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02.05.2012 18:01, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Christian König
wrote:
>
>
On 03.05.2012 18:32, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Christian König wrote:
On 02.05.2012 18:01, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Christian König
wrote:
Hi Dave,
there still seems to be the need for some further discussion about the SA
code,
so I ag
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Christian König wrote:
> On 02.05.2012 18:01, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Christian König
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Dave,
>>>
>>> there still seems to be the need for some further discussion about the SA
>>> code,
>>> so I again split that
>
> there still seems to be the need for some further discussion about the SA
> code,
> so I again split that out of the patchset and tested the result a bit.
>
> Most of the stuff still works fine without those offending changes, so to
> avoid
> mailing around unrelated and already reviewed pa
On 02.05.2012 18:01, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Christian König wrote:
Hi Dave,
there still seems to be the need for some further discussion about the SA code,
so I again split that out of the patchset and tested the result a bit.
Most of the stuff still works fine w
2012/5/2 Christian König :
> On 02.05.2012 06:04, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:00 AM, wrote:
>>>
>>> Ok so i reread stuff and the :
>>> drm/radeon: add general purpose fence signaled callback
>>> is a big NAK actually. It change the paradigm. Moving most of
>>> the handling
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Christian König wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> there still seems to be the need for some further discussion about the SA
> code,
> so I again split that out of the patchset and tested the result a bit.
>
> Most of the stuff still works fine without those offending changes,
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Christian König wrote:
> On 02.05.2012 12:32, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Christian König
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02.05.2012 06:04, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:00 AM, wrote:
>
> Ok so i reread stuf
On 02.05.2012 12:32, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Christian König
wrote:
On 02.05.2012 06:04, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:00 AM,wrote:
Ok so i reread stuff and the :
drm/radeon: add general purpose fence signaled callback
is a big NAK actually. I
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Christian König
wrote:
> On 02.05.2012 06:04, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:00 AM, wrote:
>>>
>>> Ok so i reread stuff and the :
>>> drm/radeon: add general purpose fence signaled callback
>>> is a big NAK actually. It change the paradigm. M
On 02.05.2012 06:04, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:00 AM, wrote:
Ok so i reread stuff and the :
drm/radeon: add general purpose fence signaled callback
is a big NAK actually. It change the paradigm. Moving most of
the handling into the irq process which is something i am intima
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:00 AM, wrote:
> Ok so i reread stuff and the :
> drm/radeon: add general purpose fence signaled callback
> is a big NAK actually. It change the paradigm. Moving most of
> the handling into the irq process which is something i am intimatly
> convinced we should avoid.
>
>
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 1:19 PM, wrote:
> So it's pretty much the same patchset except for patch 7 (use mutex
> instead of spinlock) and 9 & 10 which correspond to previous patch 9
> split in two and the sa allocation being simplified.
>
> The patchset can be found at :
> http://people.freedesktop
On 30.04.2012 18:26, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Christian König
wrote:
On 30.04.2012 17:12, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Jerome Glisse
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Christian König
wrote:
Hi Dave,
if nobody has a last m
2012/4/30 Christian König :
> Hi Dave,
>
> if nobody has a last moment concern please include the following patches in
> drm-next.
>
> Except for some minor fixes they have already been on the list for quite some
> time,
> but I intentional left out the debugfs related patches cause we haven't
>
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Christian König
wrote:
> On 30.04.2012 17:12, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Jerome Glisse
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Christian König
>>> wrote:
Hi Dave,
if nobody has a last moment conc
On 30.04.2012 17:12, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Christian König
wrote:
Hi Dave,
if nobody has a last moment concern please include the following patches in
drm-next.
Except for some minor fixes they have al
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Christian König
> wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> if nobody has a last moment concern please include the following patches in
>> drm-next.
>>
>> Except for some minor fixes they have already been on the list for
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Christian König
wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> if nobody has a last moment concern please include the following patches in
> drm-next.
>
> Except for some minor fixes they have already been on the list for quite some
> time,
> but I intentional left out the debugfs relat
25 matches
Mail list logo
