Re: Breakage in "track dev_mapping in more robust and flexible way"

2012-10-29 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
On 10/26/2012 03:14 PM, Ilija Hadzic wrote: On Fri, 26 Oct 2012, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: Hi, On 10/25/2012 11:27 PM, Ilija Hadzic wrote: Can you give the attached patch a whirl and let me know if it fixes the problem? As I indicated in my previous note, vmwgfx should be the only affect

Re: Breakage in "track dev_mapping in more robust and flexible way"

2012-10-26 Thread Ilija Hadzic
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: Hi, On 10/25/2012 11:27 PM, Ilija Hadzic wrote: Can you give the attached patch a whirl and let me know if it fixes the problem? As I indicated in my previous note, vmwgfx should be the only affected driver because it looks at dev_mapping in

Re: Breakage in "track dev_mapping in more robust and flexible way"

2012-10-26 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
Hi, On 10/25/2012 11:27 PM, Ilija Hadzic wrote: Can you give the attached patch a whirl and let me know if it fixes the problem? As I indicated in my previous note, vmwgfx should be the only affected driver because it looks at dev_mapping in the open hook (others do it when they create an

Re: Breakage in "track dev_mapping in more robust and flexible way"

2012-10-25 Thread Ilija Hadzic
Can you give the attached patch a whirl and let me know if it fixes the problem? As I indicated in my previous note, vmwgfx should be the only affected driver because it looks at dev_mapping in the open hook (others do it when they create an object, so they are not affected). I'll probably

Re: Breakage in "track dev_mapping in more robust and flexible way"

2012-10-25 Thread Thomas Hellström
On 10/25/12 7:12 PM, Ilija Hadzic wrote: On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Thomas Hellström wrote: On 10/25/12 4:41 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote: On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 04:02:25PM +0200, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: Hi, This commit From 949c4a34afacfe800fc442afac117aba15284962 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00

Re: Breakage in "track dev_mapping in more robust and flexible way"

2012-10-25 Thread Ilija Hadzic
Or could the driver that causes the problem be vmwgfx ? I now looked at the code and I notice that indeed vmwgfx sets its private dev_mapping in the open hook, while all other TTM-based drivers (radeon and nouveau) do it when they create an object. -- Ilija

Re: Breakage in "track dev_mapping in more robust and flexible way"

2012-10-25 Thread Ilija Hadzic
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Thomas Hellström wrote: > On 10/25/12 4:41 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 04:02:25PM +0200, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> This commit >>> >>> From 949c4a34afacfe800fc442afac117aba15284962 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>> From: Il

Re: Breakage in "track dev_mapping in more robust and flexible way"

2012-10-25 Thread Thomas Hellström
On 10/25/12 4:41 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote: On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 04:02:25PM +0200, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: Hi, This commit From 949c4a34afacfe800fc442afac117aba15284962 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ilija Hadzic Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 16:40:10 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] drm: track dev_mapping

Re: Breakage in "track dev_mapping in more robust and flexible way"

2012-10-25 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 04:02:25PM +0200, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > Hi, > > This commit > > From 949c4a34afacfe800fc442afac117aba15284962 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Ilija Hadzic > Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 16:40:10 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH] drm: track dev_mapping in more robust and flexible wa