On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 06:03:25 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> It seems like an interface we could use, I just wasn't sure how a regression
> fix
> for something in. 38 isn't a revert but requires a whole new interface
> in the core
> drm to fix. Perhaps if you can enlighten me on that I'd be happier.
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:55:27 +, Chris Wilson
> wrote:
>> For i915 there is a need to invalidate some cached state after resuming or
>> reseting the GPU. This is not quite the same as simply restoring saved
>> state (i.e. the standard sus
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:55:27 +, Chris Wilson
wrote:
> For i915 there is a need to invalidate some cached state after resuming or
> reseting the GPU. This is not quite the same as simply restoring saved
> state (i.e. the standard suspend resume method), so do not seem to merit
> reusing the sa
At Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:55:27 +,
Chris Wilson wrote:
>
> For i915 there is a need to invalidate some cached state after resuming or
> reseting the GPU. This is not quite the same as simply restoring saved
> state (i.e. the standard suspend resume method), so do not seem to merit
> reusing the s
