Re: -next trees

2012-09-27 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 04:04:43PM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote: > On 09/26/2012 12:00 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > >On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 13:47 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote: > >> > >>1. The display (LG L246WP) is confused by *any* InfoFrames. > > > >If this is still the case after applying: > > > >commit ad

Re: -next trees

2012-09-26 Thread Ian Pilcher
On 09/26/2012 12:00 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 13:47 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote: 1. The display (LG L246WP) is confused by *any* InfoFrames. If this is still the case after applying: commit adf00b26d18e1b3570451296e03bcb20e4798cdd Author: Paulo Zanoni Date: Tue Sep 25 13

Re: -next trees

2012-09-26 Thread Adam Jackson
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 13:47 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote: > In the meantime, I would like to move the ball forward on this issue. > As I see it, there 3 issues that have become conflated: > > 1. The display (LG L246WP) is confused by *any* InfoFrames. If this is still the case after applying: comm

Re: -next trees

2012-09-25 Thread Ian Pilcher
On 09/24/2012 09:34 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: I'm sorry, I thought I was clearer. Daniel posted a patch to fix the Intel driver for this: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2012-August/020046.html Which I didn't entirely ack, but which is essentially right. That's what we should do

Re: -next trees

2012-09-24 Thread Adam Jackson
On Sat, 2012-09-22 at 23:34 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote: > On 09/12/2012 08:44 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > > Ajax, I think Ian still has an open request on how to proceed with the > > infoframes quirk nightmare. > > Indeed. I'm sorry, I thought I was clearer. Daniel posted a patch to fix the Intel dri

Re: -next trees

2012-09-22 Thread Ian Pilcher
On 09/12/2012 08:44 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > Ajax, I think Ian still has an open request on how to proceed with the > infoframes quirk nightmare. Indeed. On 08/30/2012 12:23 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote: > In terms of moving forward with the rest of the EDID quirk stuff, are > you OK with either of thes

Re: -next trees

2012-09-22 Thread Paul Menzel
Am Donnerstag, den 13.09.2012, 11:44 +1000 schrieb Dave Airlie: > Just a reminder to the subtree maintainers that I should be starting > to see signs of -next trees lining up soon, > > I've merged a bunch of patches from the list, but I'm sure I've forgotten > some, > I've got the 3 quirks from P

Re: -next trees

2012-09-17 Thread Rob Clark
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > Just a reminder to the subtree maintainers that I should be starting > to see signs of -next trees lining up soon, > > I've merged a bunch of patches from the list, but I'm sure I've forgotten > some, > I've got the 3 quirks from Paul that I'm

Re: -next trees

2012-09-13 Thread Alex Deucher
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > Just a reminder to the subtree maintainers that I should be starting > to see signs of -next trees lining up soon, > > I've merged a bunch of patches from the list, but I'm sure I've forgotten > some, > I've got the 3 quirks from Paul that I'm