On 1/29/19 9:07 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Oleksandr,
>
> On 1/29/19 3:04 PM, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>> From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
>>
>> When GEM backing storage is allocated those are normal pages,
>> so there is no point using pgprot_writecombine while mmaping.
>> This fixes mismatc
On 1/30/19 11:09 AM, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> On 1/29/19 9:07 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Hi Oleksandr,
>>
>> On 1/29/19 3:04 PM, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>>> From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
>>>
>>> When GEM backing storage is allocated those are normal pages,
>>> so there is no point u
On 1/29/19 9:07 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Oleksandr,
>
> On 1/29/19 3:04 PM, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>> From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
>>
>> When GEM backing storage is allocated those are normal pages,
>> so there is no point using pgprot_writecombine while mmaping.
>> This fixes mismatc
Hi Oleksandr,
On 1/29/19 3:04 PM, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
When GEM backing storage is allocated those are normal pages,
so there is no point using pgprot_writecombine while mmaping.
This fixes mismatch of buffer pages' memory attributes between
the frontend
