Re: [RFCv1 11/12] drm: Atomic modeset ioctl

2013-10-08 Thread Rob Clark
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Matt Roper wrote: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 05:18:02PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 09:55:47AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: >> > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Ville Syrjälä >> > wrote: >> > > On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 08:45:49PM -0400, Rob Clar

Re: [RFCv1 11/12] drm: Atomic modeset ioctl

2013-10-08 Thread Matt Roper
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 05:18:02PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 09:55:47AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Ville Syrjälä > > wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 08:45:49PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: ... > > >> + > > >> + state = dev->driver->a

Re: [RFCv1 11/12] drm: Atomic modeset ioctl

2013-10-07 Thread Rob Clark
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 11:20:54AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: >> yeah, current atomic patch is almost an afterthought in this series. >> I still need to get planes working on msm and find some test code (I >> guess you have some somewhere?).. so

Re: [RFCv1 11/12] drm: Atomic modeset ioctl

2013-10-07 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 11:20:54AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: > yeah, current atomic patch is almost an afterthought in this series. > I still need to get planes working on msm and find some test code (I > guess you have some somewhere?).. so other than just rebasing it > enough to compile, I didn't

Re: [RFCv1 11/12] drm: Atomic modeset ioctl

2013-10-07 Thread Rob Clark
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:39:01AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Ville Syrjälä >> wrote: >> > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 09:55:47AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: >> >> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Ville Syrjälä >> >>

Re: [RFCv1 11/12] drm: Atomic modeset ioctl

2013-10-07 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:39:01AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Ville Syrjälä > wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 09:55:47AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Ville Syrjälä > >> wrote: > >> > On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 08:45:49PM -0400, Rob C

Re: [RFCv1 11/12] drm: Atomic modeset ioctl

2013-10-07 Thread Rob Clark
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 09:55:47AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Ville Syrjälä >> wrote: >> > On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 08:45:49PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: >> >> From: Ville Syrjälä >> >> >> >> The atomic modeset i

Re: [RFCv1 11/12] drm: Atomic modeset ioctl

2013-10-07 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 09:55:47AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Ville Syrjälä > wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 08:45:49PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: > >> From: Ville Syrjälä > >> > >> The atomic modeset ioctl cna be used to push any number of new values > >> for obje

Re: [RFCv1 11/12] drm: Atomic modeset ioctl

2013-10-07 Thread Rob Clark
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 08:45:49PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: >> From: Ville Syrjälä >> >> The atomic modeset ioctl cna be used to push any number of new values >> for object properties. The driver can then check the full device >> configuration

Re: [RFCv1 11/12] drm: Atomic modeset ioctl

2013-10-07 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 08:45:49PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > The atomic modeset ioctl cna be used to push any number of new values > for object properties. The driver can then check the full device > configuration as single unit, and try to apply the changes atomically. >