On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 9:02 AM Anton Ivanov
wrote:
>
>
> On 12/11/18 2:41 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 15:09:26 +0100
> > Petr Mladek wrote:
> >
> >>> We have liburcu already, which is good. The main sticking points are:
> >>>
> >>> - printk has started adding a lot of %p
On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 15:09:26 +0100
Petr Mladek wrote:
> > We have liburcu already, which is good. The main sticking points are:
> >
> > - printk has started adding a lot of %pX enhancements which printf
> >obviously doesn't know about.
>
> I wonder how big problem it is and if it is wor
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 12:32:47PM +, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> Oh - although, yes - there are some good concepts there - but I'm a bit
> weary of how easy it would be to 'run' the said test against multiple
> kernel version libraries... there would be a lot of possible ABI
> conflicts perhaps.
>
Hi Matthew,
On 06/12/2018 15:37, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 12:32:47PM +, Kieran Bingham wrote:
>> On 04/12/2018 20:47, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 03:48:15PM -0800, Brendan Higgins wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 5:54 AM Kieran Bingham
wr
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 12:32:47PM +, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> On 04/12/2018 20:47, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 03:48:15PM -0800, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 5:54 AM Kieran Bingham
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Brendan,
> >>>
> >>> Thanks again for t
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 12:32:47PM +, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> My main initial idea for a libumlinux is to provide infrastructure such
> as our linked-lists and other kernel formatting so that we can take
> kernel code directly to userspace for test and debug (assuming that
> there are no hardwa
Hi Luis,
On 04/12/2018 20:47, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 03:48:15PM -0800, Brendan Higgins wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 5:54 AM Kieran Bingham
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Brendan,
>>>
>>> Thanks again for this series!
>>>
>>> On 28/11/2018 19:36, Brendan Higgins wrote:
T
On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 03:50:48PM -0800, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 7:44 PM Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 11:36:28AM -0800, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > > The ultimate goal is to create minimal isolated test binaries; in the
> > > meantime we are usin
On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 03:48:15PM -0800, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 5:54 AM Kieran Bingham
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Brendan,
> >
> > Thanks again for this series!
> >
> > On 28/11/2018 19:36, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > > The ultimate goal is to create minimal isolated test binari
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 7:44 PM Luis Chamberlain wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 11:36:28AM -0800, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > The ultimate goal is to create minimal isolated test binaries; in the
> > meantime we are using UML to provide the infrastructure to run tests, so
> > define an abstract
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 5:54 AM Kieran Bingham
wrote:
>
> Hi Brendan,
>
> Thanks again for this series!
>
> On 28/11/2018 19:36, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > The ultimate goal is to create minimal isolated test binaries; in the
> > meantime we are using UML to provide the infrastructure to run tests
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 11:36:28AM -0800, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> The ultimate goal is to create minimal isolated test binaries; in the
> meantime we are using UML to provide the infrastructure to run tests, so
> define an abstract way to configure and run tests that allow us to
> change the conte
Hi Brendan,
Thanks again for this series!
On 28/11/2018 19:36, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> The ultimate goal is to create minimal isolated test binaries; in the
> meantime we are using UML to provide the infrastructure to run tests, so
> define an abstract way to configure and run tests that allow u
13 matches
Mail list logo
