09.09.2020 11:40, Mikko Perttunen пишет:
> On 9/9/20 2:36 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 05.09.2020 13:34, Mikko Perttunen пишет:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> here's a second revision of the Host1x/TegraDRM UAPI proposal,
>>> hopefully with most issues from v1 resolved, and also with
>>> an implementation. T
09.09.2020 11:44, Mikko Perttunen пишет:
...
>> Could you please enumerate all the currently opened questions?
>>
>
> Which open questions do you refer to?
Anything related to the UAPI definition that needs more thought. If
there is nothing outstanding, then good!
> The open items of v1 should b
On 9/9/20 5:20 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
05.09.2020 13:34, Mikko Perttunen пишет:
Hi all,
here's a second revision of the Host1x/TegraDRM UAPI proposal,
hopefully with most issues from v1 resolved, and also with
an implementation. There are still open issues with the
implementation:
* Relocs
On 9/9/20 2:36 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
05.09.2020 13:34, Mikko Perttunen пишет:
Hi all,
here's a second revision of the Host1x/TegraDRM UAPI proposal,
hopefully with most issues from v1 resolved, and also with
an implementation. There are still open issues with the
implementation:
Could you
05.09.2020 13:34, Mikko Perttunen пишет:
> Hi all,
>
> here's a second revision of the Host1x/TegraDRM UAPI proposal,
> hopefully with most issues from v1 resolved, and also with
> an implementation. There are still open issues with the
> implementation:
>
> * Relocs are now handled on TegraDRM s
05.09.2020 13:34, Mikko Perttunen пишет:
> Hi all,
>
> here's a second revision of the Host1x/TegraDRM UAPI proposal,
> hopefully with most issues from v1 resolved, and also with
> an implementation. There are still open issues with the
> implementation:
Could you please clarify the current status
