Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Add support for suppressing warning backtraces

2024-03-10 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 10:40:28AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > Some unit tests intentionally trigger warning backtraces by passing bad > parameters to kernel API functions. Such unit tests typically check the > return value from such calls, not the existence of the warning backtrace. > > Such in

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Add support for suppressing warning backtraces

2024-03-06 Thread Guenter Roeck
Hi Daniel, On 3/6/24 10:24, Daniel Díaz wrote: [ ... ] Thank you SO very much for this work! This is very much appreciated! Thanks a lot for the feedback. We run into these warnings at LKFT all the time, and making sure that the noise doesn't drown the relevant signal is very important.

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Add support for suppressing warning backtraces

2024-03-06 Thread Daniel Díaz
Hello! On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 at 12:40, Guenter Roeck wrote: > Some unit tests intentionally trigger warning backtraces by passing bad > parameters to kernel API functions. Such unit tests typically check the > return value from such calls, not the existence of the warning backtrace. > > Such intenti