Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/mm: Fix PAT bit missing from page protection modify mask

2023-05-02 Thread Andi Shyti
Hi, a kind reminder on this patch, would be fantastic if anyone from the x86 maintainers cha give it a look. The patch has been tested thoroughly and even if it's marked as an RFC in my opinion it can be already considered for a proper review. Thanks, Andi On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 02:35:24PM +02

Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/mm: Fix PAT bit missing from page protection modify mask

2023-04-28 Thread Andi Shyti
Hi Janusz, On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 02:35:24PM +0200, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote: > Visible glitches have been observed when running graphics applications on > Linux under Xen hypervisor. Those observations have been confirmed with > failures from kms_pwrite_crc Intel GPU test that verifies data coh

Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/mm: Fix PAT bit missing from page protection modify mask

2023-04-28 Thread Andi Shyti
Hi Janusz, On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 02:35:24PM +0200, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote: > Visible glitches have been observed when running graphics applications on > Linux under Xen hypervisor. Those observations have been confirmed with > failures from kms_pwrite_crc Intel GPU test that verifies data coh

Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/mm: Fix PAT bit missing from page protection modify mask

2023-04-24 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 02:35:24PM +0200, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote: > Visible glitches have been observed when running graphics applications on > Linux under Xen hypervisor. Those observations have been confirmed with > failures from kms_pwrite_crc Intel GPU test that verifies data coherency > of

Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/mm: Fix PAT bit missing from page protection modify mask

2023-04-24 Thread Juergen Gross
On 24.04.23 14:35, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote: Visible glitches have been observed when running graphics applications on Linux under Xen hypervisor. Those observations have been confirmed with failures from kms_pwrite_crc Intel GPU test that verifies data coherency of DRM frame buffer objects usin