> > Sent: Monday, September 10, 2018 1:28 PM
> > To: Ville Syrjälä
> > Cc: Satish Kumar Nagireddy ; dri-
> > de...@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] drm: Add new DIRTY fb flags to pass interlaced
> > alternate fields
> >
> > On Mo
ddy ; dri-
> de...@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] drm: Add new DIRTY fb flags to pass interlaced
> alternate fields
>
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 03:02:16PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 02:46:21PM -0700, Satish Kumar Nagireddy wrote:
> >
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 03:02:16PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 02:46:21PM -0700, Satish Kumar Nagireddy wrote:
> > The requirement is to render interlaced alternate buffers. In case of
> > alternate, top field and bottom field are in two different buffers.
> >
> > The que
On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 02:46:21PM -0700, Satish Kumar Nagireddy wrote:
> The requirement is to render interlaced alternate buffers. In case of
> alternate, top field and bottom field are in two different buffers.
>
> The question is, can we pass existing flags DRM_MODE_PRESENT_TOP_FIELD
> and DRM
