On 05.03.2025 08:15, Christian König wrote:
Am 04.03.25 um 16:39 schrieb Lis, Tomasz:
There was no NACK, and no further questions/comments for a month.
From that, we conclude that the proposed change is considered acceptable.
Well there was also not any comment from Arun nor Matthew who are
Am 05.02.25 um 17:02 schrieb Lis, Tomasz:
>
> On 05.02.2025 09:32, Christian König wrote:
>> Am 04.02.25 um 23:41 schrieb Tomasz Lis:
>>> This RFC asks for introduction of an interface which allows to shift
>>> a range managed by drm_mm instance without repeating the node list
>>> creation.
>>
>> W
Am 04.03.25 um 16:39 schrieb Lis, Tomasz:
> There was no NACK, and no further questions/comments for a month.
>
> From that, we conclude that the proposed change is considered acceptable.
Well there was also not any comment from Arun nor Matthew who are the de facto
maintainers for this particula
There was no NACK, and no further questions/comments for a month.
From that, we conclude that the proposed change is considered acceptable.
In case anyone disagrees, please respond now.
We are starting work on a series which will use the proposed drm_mm
function.
-Tomasz
On 04.02.2025 23:41
On 05.02.2025 09:32, Christian König wrote:
Am 04.02.25 um 23:41 schrieb Tomasz Lis:
This RFC asks for introduction of an interface which allows to shift
a range managed by drm_mm instance without repeating the node list
creation.
What do you mean with "shift" here? As far as I can see from
Am 04.02.25 um 23:41 schrieb Tomasz Lis:
This RFC asks for introduction of an interface which allows to shift
a range managed by drm_mm instance without repeating the node list
creation.
What do you mean with "shift" here? As far as I can see from the code
you just modify the start address of
