On Sun, Apr 02, 2017 at 09:13:34AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 8:46 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 03:11:36PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> >> We possibly missed the boat on redefining rmfb semantics for atomic
> >> userspace to something more sane, unless pe
On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 8:46 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 03:11:36PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
>> We possibly missed the boat on redefining rmfb semantics for atomic
>> userspace to something more sane, unless perhaps the few existing atomic
>> userspaces (CrOS?) could confirm t
On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 03:11:36PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> We possibly missed the boat on redefining rmfb semantics for atomic
> userspace to something more sane, unless perhaps the few existing atomic
> userspaces (CrOS?) could confirm that this change won't cause problems
> (in which case we co
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> We possibly missed the boat on redefining rmfb semantics for atomic
> userspace to something more sane, unless perhaps the few existing atomic
> userspaces (CrOS?) could confirm that this change won't cause problems
> (in which case we could just
