On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 10:23:04AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Am 12.05.21 um 10:13 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 09:34:11PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> > > Am 11.05.21 um 18:48 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > > > [SNIP]
> > > > > Why?
> > > > If you allow implicit fencing t
Am 12.05.21 um 10:13 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 09:34:11PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
Am 11.05.21 um 18:48 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
[SNIP]
Why?
If you allow implicit fencing then you can end up with
- an implicit userspace fence as the in-fence
- but an explicit dma_fence
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 09:34:11PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Am 11.05.21 um 18:48 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > [SNIP]
> > > Why?
> > If you allow implicit fencing then you can end up with
> > - an implicit userspace fence as the in-fence
> > - but an explicit dma_fence as the out fence
> >
> >
Am 11.05.21 um 18:48 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
[SNIP]
Why?
If you allow implicit fencing then you can end up with
- an implicit userspace fence as the in-fence
- but an explicit dma_fence as the out fence
Which is not allowed. So there's really no way to make this work, except
if you stall in the
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 05:32:29PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Am 11.05.21 um 16:23 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 09:47:56AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> > > Am 11.05.21 um 09:31 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > > > [SNIP]
> > > > > > And that's just the one ioctl I know is bi
Am 11.05.21 um 16:23 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 09:47:56AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
Am 11.05.21 um 09:31 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
[SNIP]
And that's just the one ioctl I know is big trouble, I'm sure we'll find
more funny corner cases when we roll out explicit user fencin
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 09:47:56AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Am 11.05.21 um 09:31 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > [SNIP]
> > > > And that's just the one ioctl I know is big trouble, I'm sure we'll find
> > > > more funny corner cases when we roll out explicit user fencing.
> > > I think we can jus
Am 11.05.21 um 09:31 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
[SNIP]
And that's just the one ioctl I know is big trouble, I'm sure we'll find
more funny corner cases when we roll out explicit user fencing.
I think we can just ignore sync_file. As far as it concerns me that UAPI is
pretty much dead.
Uh that's ra
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 08:12:31PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Am 04.05.21 um 17:11 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 04:26:42PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> > > Hi Daniel,
> > >
> > > Am 04.05.21 um 16:15 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > > > Hi Christian,
> > > >
> > > > On Tue
Am 04.05.21 um 17:11 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 04:26:42PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Am 04.05.21 um 16:15 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
Hi Christian,
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 03:27:17PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
Hi guys,
with this patch set I want to look into
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 04:26:42PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Am 04.05.21 um 16:15 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > Hi Christian,
> >
> > On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 03:27:17PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> > > Hi guys,
> > >
> > > with this patch set I want to look into how much mor
Hi Daniel,
Am 04.05.21 um 16:15 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
Hi Christian,
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 03:27:17PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
Hi guys,
with this patch set I want to look into how much more additional work it
would be to support implicit sync compared to only explicit sync.
Turned out
Hi Christian,
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 03:27:17PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> with this patch set I want to look into how much more additional work it
> would be to support implicit sync compared to only explicit sync.
>
> Turned out that this is much simpler than expected since
13 matches
Mail list logo
