Re: [PATCH v7 05/10] drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: Add atomic_check

2022-10-17 Thread Jagan Teki
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 12:53 PM Marek Vasut wrote: > > On 10/17/22 05:54, Jagan Teki wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 16, 2022 at 2:53 AM Marek Vasut wrote: > >> > >> On 10/5/22 17:13, Jagan Teki wrote: > >>> Look like an explicit fixing up of mode_flags is required for DSIM IP > >>> present in i.MX8M Min

Re: [PATCH v7 05/10] drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: Add atomic_check

2022-10-17 Thread Marek Vasut
On 10/17/22 05:54, Jagan Teki wrote: On Sun, Oct 16, 2022 at 2:53 AM Marek Vasut wrote: On 10/5/22 17:13, Jagan Teki wrote: Look like an explicit fixing up of mode_flags is required for DSIM IP present in i.MX8M Mini/Nano SoCs. At least the LCDIF + DSIM needs active low sync polarities in or

Re: [PATCH v7 05/10] drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: Add atomic_check

2022-10-16 Thread Jagan Teki
On Sun, Oct 16, 2022 at 2:53 AM Marek Vasut wrote: > > On 10/5/22 17:13, Jagan Teki wrote: > > Look like an explicit fixing up of mode_flags is required for DSIM IP > > present in i.MX8M Mini/Nano SoCs. > > > > At least the LCDIF + DSIM needs active low sync polarities in order > > to correlate th

Re: [PATCH v7 05/10] drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: Add atomic_check

2022-10-15 Thread Marek Vasut
On 10/5/22 17:13, Jagan Teki wrote: Look like an explicit fixing up of mode_flags is required for DSIM IP present in i.MX8M Mini/Nano SoCs. At least the LCDIF + DSIM needs active low sync polarities in order to correlate the correct sync flags of the surrounding components in the chain to make s