On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 03:05:50PM +0100, Javier Carrasco wrote:
> The current mechanism uses generic names for the power supplies, which
> conflicts with proper name definitions in the device bindings.
>
> Add a per-device property to include real supply names and keep generic
> names as a fallba
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 10:33:53PM +0100, Javier Carrasco wrote:
> On 21.02.24 22:18, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> +/*
> + * Fallback supply names for backwards compatibility. If the device
> requires
> + * more than the currently supported supplies, add a new one here, and
> >>
On 21.02.24 22:18, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
+/*
+ * Fallback supply names for backwards compatibility. If the device
requires
+ * more than the currently supported supplies, add a new one here, and if
+ * possible, the real name supplies to the device-specific data.
+
Hi Javier,
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 09:40:38PM +0100, Javier Carrasco wrote:
> On 21.02.24 21:25, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 03:05:50PM +0100, Javier Carrasco wrote:
> >> The current mechanism uses generic names for the power supplies, which
> >> conflicts with proper name
On 21.02.24 21:25, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 03:05:50PM +0100, Javier Carrasco wrote:
>> The current mechanism uses generic names for the power supplies, which
>> conflicts with proper name definitions in the device bindings.
>>
>> Add a per-device property to include real
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 03:05:50PM +0100, Javier Carrasco wrote:
> The current mechanism uses generic names for the power supplies, which
> conflicts with proper name definitions in the device bindings.
>
> Add a per-device property to include real supply names and keep generic
> names as a fallba
