On Tue, 2025-07-08 at 14:02 +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
>
> On 11/02/2025 11:14, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> > drm_sched_init() has a great many parameters and upcoming new
> > functionality for the scheduler might add even more. Generally, the
> > great number of parameters reduces readability a
On 11/02/2025 11:14, Philipp Stanner wrote:
drm_sched_init() has a great many parameters and upcoming new
functionality for the scheduler might add even more. Generally, the
great number of parameters reduces readability and has already caused
one missnaming, addressed in:
commit 6f1cacf4eba7
On Tue, 2025-02-11 at 12:14 +0100, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> drm_sched_init() has a great many parameters and upcoming new
> functionality for the scheduler might add even more. Generally, the
> great number of parameters reduces readability and has already caused
> one missnaming, addressed in:
>
On 2/11/25 03:14, Philipp Stanner wrote:
drm_sched_init() has a great many parameters and upcoming new
functionality for the scheduler might add even more. Generally, the
great number of parameters reduces readability and has already caused
one missnaming, addressed in:
commit 6f1cacf4eba7 ("d
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 12:14:23PM +0100, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> drm_sched_init() has a great many parameters and upcoming new
> functionality for the scheduler might add even more. Generally, the
> great number of parameters reduces readability and has already caused
> one missnaming, addressed