On Sat, Feb 08, 2025 at 09:37:56AM +0100, Louis Chauvet wrote:
> On 08/02/25 - 08:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 05:59:04PM +0100, Louis Chauvet wrote:
> > > On 06/02/25 - 18:38, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > The vkms driver does not need to create a platform device,
On 08/02/25 - 08:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 05:59:04PM +0100, Louis Chauvet wrote:
> > On 06/02/25 - 18:38, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > The vkms driver does not need to create a platform device, as there is
> > > no real platform resources associated it, it only di
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 05:59:04PM +0100, Louis Chauvet wrote:
> On 06/02/25 - 18:38, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > The vkms driver does not need to create a platform device, as there is
> > no real platform resources associated it, it only did so because it was
> > simple to do that in order to g
On 06/02/25 - 18:38, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> The vkms driver does not need to create a platform device, as there is
> no real platform resources associated it, it only did so because it was
> simple to do that in order to get a device to use for resource
> management of drm resources. Change
On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 03:03:41PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote:
> Lol, I wrote up a patch for this last night but it looks like you got here
> first :P
>
> On Thu, 2025-02-06 at 18:38 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > The vkms driver does not need to create a platform device, as there is
> > no rea
Lol, I wrote up a patch for this last night but it looks like you got here
first :P
On Thu, 2025-02-06 at 18:38 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> The vkms driver does not need to create a platform device, as there is
> no real platform resources associated it, it only did so because it was
> sim