On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 09:47:51PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 05:38:08PM +0100, Simona Vetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 03:29:12PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 02:07:18PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2025
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 05:38:08PM +0100, Simona Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 03:29:12PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 02:07:18PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 06:35:15PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2025
On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 03:29:12PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 02:07:18PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 06:35:15PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 03:43:51PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > > Other entities (drm_c
On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 02:07:18PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 06:35:15PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 03:43:51PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > Other entities (drm_connector.crtc, drm_encoder.crtc, etc.) have
> > > pointer to other current
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 06:35:15PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 03:43:51PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Other entities (drm_connector.crtc, drm_encoder.crtc, etc.) have
> > pointer to other currently bound entities. They are all considered
> > relevant only for non-at
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 03:43:51PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Other entities (drm_connector.crtc, drm_encoder.crtc, etc.) have
> pointer to other currently bound entities. They are all considered
> relevant only for non-atomic drivers, and generally perceived as
> deprecated in favour of the equ
