On 2023-07-20 21:10:52, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> On 2023-07-20 01:24:27, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Jul 2023 at 01:09, Marijn Suijten
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2023-07-19 01:06:03, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > > On 19/07/2023 00:24, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> > > > > SM6125 is identical t
On 2023-07-20 01:24:27, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2023 at 01:09, Marijn Suijten
> wrote:
> >
> > On 2023-07-19 01:06:03, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > On 19/07/2023 00:24, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> > > > SM6125 is identical to SM6375 except that while downstream also defines
> > > > a
On Thu, 20 Jul 2023 at 01:09, Marijn Suijten
wrote:
>
> On 2023-07-19 01:06:03, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On 19/07/2023 00:24, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> > > SM6125 is identical to SM6375 except that while downstream also defines
> > > a throttle clock, its presence results in timeouts whereas SM63
On 2023-07-19 01:06:03, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 19/07/2023 00:24, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> > SM6125 is identical to SM6375 except that while downstream also defines
> > a throttle clock, its presence results in timeouts whereas SM6375
> > requires it to not observe any timeouts. This is repres
On 19/07/2023 00:24, Marijn Suijten wrote:
SM6125 is identical to SM6375 except that while downstream also defines
a throttle clock, its presence results in timeouts whereas SM6375
requires it to not observe any timeouts. This is represented by
reducing the clock array length to 6 so that it can
