Re: [PATCH v3 00/19] Converge on using secs_to_jiffies()

2024-12-17 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 12:53:22 -0800 Easwar Hariharan wrote: > There have been a couple of comments[1][2] that came in after you queued > the series to mm. Would you rather I send individual patches addressing > these, or just send a v4 of the entire series (-netdev of course) so you > can replace

Re: [PATCH v3 00/19] Converge on using secs_to_jiffies()

2024-12-17 Thread Easwar Hariharan
On 12/10/2024 5:00 PM, Easwar Hariharan wrote: > On 12/10/2024 4:35 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 22:02:31 + Easwar Hariharan >> wrote: >> >>> This is a series that follows up on my previous series to introduce >>> secs_to_jiffies() and convert a few initial users. >> >> Tha

Re: [PATCH v3 00/19] Converge on using secs_to_jiffies()

2024-12-10 Thread Easwar Hariharan
On 12/10/2024 6:41 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 18:31:30 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote: I'll just grab everything and see if anyone complains ;) >>> >>> I may, if this leads to a conflict :( >> >> Very unlikely, and any such conflict will be trivial. > > Agreed, mainly I do

Re: [PATCH v3 00/19] Converge on using secs_to_jiffies()

2024-12-10 Thread Jakub Kicinski
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 18:50:40 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Very unlikely, and any such conflict will be trivial. > > > > Agreed, mainly I don't understand why we'd make an exception > > and take the patchset via a special tree. > > It saves work for everyone? > > The patches are super-sim

Re: [PATCH v3 00/19] Converge on using secs_to_jiffies()

2024-12-10 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 18:41:29 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 18:31:30 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > I'll just grab everything and see if anyone complains ;) > > > > > > I may, if this leads to a conflict :( > > > > Very unlikely, and any such conflict will be trivial.

Re: [PATCH v3 00/19] Converge on using secs_to_jiffies()

2024-12-10 Thread Jakub Kicinski
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 18:31:30 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote: > > > I'll just grab everything and see if anyone complains ;) > > > > I may, if this leads to a conflict :( > > Very unlikely, and any such conflict will be trivial. Agreed, mainly I don't understand why we'd make an exception and take

Re: [PATCH v3 00/19] Converge on using secs_to_jiffies()

2024-12-10 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 17:35:48 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 15:36:04 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote: > > > I have the same question as before: How do you expect these to land? > > > Do you now have a maintainer who will take all of them? > > > Or do you want individual maintainers t

Re: [PATCH v3 00/19] Converge on using secs_to_jiffies()

2024-12-10 Thread Jakub Kicinski
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 15:36:04 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote: > > I have the same question as before: How do you expect these to land? > > Do you now have a maintainer who will take all of them? > > Or do you want individual maintainers to take the ones applicable to them? > > I'll just grab everythin

Re: [PATCH v3 00/19] Converge on using secs_to_jiffies()

2024-12-10 Thread Easwar Hariharan
On 12/10/2024 4:35 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 22:02:31 + Easwar Hariharan > wrote: > >> This is a series that follows up on my previous series to introduce >> secs_to_jiffies() and convert a few initial users. > > Thanks, I added this to mm.git. I suppressed the usual a

Re: [PATCH v3 00/19] Converge on using secs_to_jiffies()

2024-12-10 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 22:02:31 + Easwar Hariharan wrote: > This is a series that follows up on my previous series to introduce > secs_to_jiffies() and convert a few initial users. Thanks, I added this to mm.git. I suppressed the usual added-to-mm emails because s many cc's! I'd ask rele

Re: [PATCH v3 00/19] Converge on using secs_to_jiffies()

2024-12-10 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 15:14:22 -0800 Jeff Johnson wrote: > On 12/10/2024 2:02 PM, Easwar Hariharan wrote: > > This is a series that follows up on my previous series to introduce > > secs_to_jiffies() and convert a few initial users.[1] In the review for > > that series, Anna-Maria requested conver

Re: [PATCH v3 00/19] Converge on using secs_to_jiffies()

2024-12-10 Thread Jeff Johnson
On 12/10/2024 2:02 PM, Easwar Hariharan wrote: > This is a series that follows up on my previous series to introduce > secs_to_jiffies() and convert a few initial users.[1] In the review for > that series, Anna-Maria requested converting other users with > Coccinelle. [2] This is part 1 that conver