On Wed, 2019-09-04 at 11:23 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> > Sure this will work, but still we need somehow to be able to
> > determine
> > this "if it's different" state. In your solution we just move that
> > comparison to drm_connector_update_edid_property, which is quite
> > fine
> > for me.
On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 08:36:46AM +, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-09-03 at 17:49 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 11:49:23AM +, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2019-09-03 at 11:40 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > In fact I was
On Tue, 2019-09-03 at 17:49 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 11:49:23AM +, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> > On Tue, 2019-09-03 at 11:40 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > >
> > > > > In fact I was wrong - when it worked, it was using exactly
> > > > > those
> > > > > patches :
On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 11:49:23AM +, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-09-03 at 11:40 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > > > In fact I was wrong - when it worked, it was using exactly those
> > > > patches :). With clean drm-tip - it seems to work ocassionally
> > > > and it
> > > >
On Tue, 2019-09-03 at 11:49 +, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-09-03 at 11:40 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > > > In fact I was wrong - when it worked, it was using exactly
> > > > those
> > > > patches :). With clean drm-tip - it seems to work ocassionally
> > > > and it
> > >
On Tue, 2019-09-03 at 11:40 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> > > In fact I was wrong - when it worked, it was using exactly those
> > > patches :). With clean drm-tip - it seems to work ocassionally
> > > and it
> > > doesn't update the actual display edid and other stuff, so even
> > > when
> > >
On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 09:17:49AM +, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-08-19 at 09:05 +, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> > On Mon, 2019-08-19 at 08:35 +0100, Peres, Martin wrote:
> > > On 19/08/2019 10:23, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2019-08-07 at 23:07 +0200, Daniel
On Mon, 2019-08-19 at 09:05 +, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-08-19 at 08:35 +0100, Peres, Martin wrote:
> > On 19/08/2019 10:23, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2019-08-07 at 23:07 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > So igt isn't valid userspace (it's ju
On Mon, 2019-08-19 at 08:35 +0100, Peres, Martin wrote:
> On 19/08/2019 10:23, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-08-07 at 23:07 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > So igt isn't valid userspace (it's just good testcases). Can we
> > > repro
> > > the
> > > same on real userspa
On 19/08/2019 10:23, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-08-07 at 23:07 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 07:43:18AM +, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 19:43 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:06 PM Lisovskiy, Stanislav
>>
On Wed, 2019-08-07 at 23:07 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 07:43:18AM +, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> > On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 19:43 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:06 PM Lisovskiy, Stanislav
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2019-08-06 at
On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 07:43:18AM +, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 19:43 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:06 PM Lisovskiy, Stanislav
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 15:51 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 03
On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 19:43 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:06 PM Lisovskiy, Stanislav
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 15:51 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 03:55:48PM +0300, Stanislav Lisovskiy
> > > wrote:
> > > > This series introduce to
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:06 PM Lisovskiy, Stanislav
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 15:51 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 03:55:48PM +0300, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> > > This series introduce to drm a way to determine if something else
> > > except connection_status had
On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 15:51 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 03:55:48PM +0300, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> > This series introduce to drm a way to determine if something else
> > except connection_status had changed during probing, which
> > can be used by other drivers as wel
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 03:55:48PM +0300, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> This series introduce to drm a way to determine if something else
> except connection_status had changed during probing, which
> can be used by other drivers as well. Another i915 specific part
> uses this approach to determine
16 matches
Mail list logo
