On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 01:45:45AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hello Adam,
>
> Ping ?
>
> Daniel, would it help getting the driver in v3.11 if I resubmit it now with a
> get_modes operation that just returns 0 ?
Yeah, I guess that works, too.
-Daniel
>
> On Friday 14 June 2013 16:03:19 D
Hello Adam,
Ping ?
Daniel, would it help getting the driver in v3.11 if I resubmit it now with a
get_modes operation that just returns 0 ?
On Friday 14 June 2013 16:03:19 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 02:54:04AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Friday 07 June 2013 10:50:55
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 02:54:04AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Friday 07 June 2013 10:50:55 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 09:44:45AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 05 June 2013 10:55:05 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 a
Hi Daniel,
On Friday 07 June 2013 10:50:55 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 09:44:45AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Wednesday 05 June 2013 10:55:05 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 03:51:53AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 04 June 2013 20
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 09:23:58AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Thursday 06 June 2013 09:21:35 Alex Deucher wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > >> To me at least, it doesn't make sense that an encoder c
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 09:44:45AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Wednesday 05 June 2013 10:55:05 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 03:51:53AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 04 June 2013 20:36:20 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 a
Hi Daniel,
On Wednesday 05 June 2013 10:55:05 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 03:51:53AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tuesday 04 June 2013 20:36:20 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 04 June 2013 16:12:36 Da
On Thursday 06 June 2013 09:21:35 Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> >> To me at least, it doesn't make sense that an encoder can clone
> >> itself. If an encoder is already in use, trying to clone it
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> To me at least, it doesn't make sense that an encoder can clone
>> itself. If an encoder is already in use, trying to clone itself would
>> only lead to confusion and possible bugs (make
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> To me at least, it doesn't make sense that an encoder can clone
> itself. If an encoder is already in use, trying to clone itself would
> only lead to confusion and possible bugs (make sure some code path
> doesn't try and reprogram the encode
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Tuesday 04 June 2013 20:36:20 Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 04 June 2013 16:12:36 Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 04:53:40AM +0200, Laure
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 03:51:53AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Tuesday 04 June 2013 20:36:20 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 04 June 2013 16:12:36 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 04:53:40AM
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 03:51:53AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Tuesday 04 June 2013 20:36:20 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 04 June 2013 16:12:36 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 04:53:40AM
Hi Daniel,
On Tuesday 04 June 2013 20:36:20 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tuesday 04 June 2013 16:12:36 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 04:53:40AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> >> Should we add that to crtc
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Tuesday 04 June 2013 16:12:36 Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 04:53:40AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
[snip]
>> Should we add that to crtc helpers, instead of the current "just try to
>> smash the old c
Hi Daniel,
On Tuesday 04 June 2013 16:12:36 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 04:53:40AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > The R-Car Display Unit (DU) DRM driver supports both superposition
> > processors and all eight planes in RGB and YUV formats with alpha
> > blending.
> >
> > O
16 matches
Mail list logo