Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] drm/msm/dpu: split interrupt address arrays

2023-05-26 Thread Neil Armstrong
On 22/05/2023 23:45, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: There is no point in having a single enum (and a single array) for both DPU < 7.0 and DPU >= 7.0 interrupt registers. Instead define a single enum and two IRQ address arrays. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov --- .../msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_7_0_sm8

Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] drm/msm/dpu: split interrupt address arrays

2023-05-22 Thread Marijn Suijten
... for 7xxx? On 2023-05-23 00:45:24, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > There is no point in having a single enum (and a single array) for both > DPU < 7.0 and DPU >= 7.0 interrupt registers. Instead define a single > enum and two IRQ address arrays. > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov Really like this